Subject:
|
Re: Yet Another Technic Creation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 May 2001 01:00:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2569 times
|
| |
|
|
This is very much my approach
I'll try a way, and exhaust its possibilities before attacking the problem
from another direction, sometimes working backwords, destroying earlier
solutions that worked just fine before.
This was particularly true of my digger model, where pretty much the entire
model went through several rebuilds to fit it all in.
This is, of course, excellent work jennifer. Especially the realism of the
detailing, this is a model team model with technic workings. Congrats. I
have decided that there are no more construction vehicles to make (except
maybe a grader, but that dosn't particularly interest me) so I've got a far
more radical plan in store for my next model.. if i can pull it off!
Nice work
--
Batfink
Jennifer Clark <jen@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:3AF18C05.5CC39618@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk...
> John Koob wrote:
>
> > Do you make multiple versions of one portion of a model, especially
> > something
> > such as arranging gears and such to fit into the structure? How many?
> > I find that I usually can get satisfactory results after about three to
> > eight steps of refinement.
>
> I do indeed have multiple versions of various parts of the model, and the
> number of attempts needed varies considerably. I probably need about 3 to • 8
> steps for relatively simple parts, but this will increase if, for example,
> there are other mechanisms competing for space in the same area, such as • the
> boom lock and rear bogie gears on the truck. In the latter case the • complexity
> seems to increase exponentially.
>
> Sometimes I have major and minor versions, as it were; there will be an • idea,
> then I try out all the sub-possibilities of that idea, then try a • radically new
> direction, and so on. The boom lifting mechanism was like this in that it • took
> about four major versions to get it strong enough to lift the skip; • previous
> versions eventually worked after quite a bit of tinkering but were too • weak.
>
> I am probably quite a slow builder in this regard, but usually I get there • in
> the end ;-)
>
> Jennifer
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Yet Another Technic Creation
|
| (...) Sounds intriguing, although I most strongly disagree with the notion that there are no more construction vehicles to make - but then, I would :-) Jennifer (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Yet Another Technic Creation
|
| (...) I do indeed have multiple versions of various parts of the model, and the number of attempts needed varies considerably. I probably need about 3 to 8 steps for relatively simple parts, but this will increase if, for example, there are other (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
