Subject:
|
Re: New TECHNIC sets for Fall 2008. Box images leaked!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:13:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11403 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, and you're talking about rewiring the
> PF/NXT connectors, I do not see that a NXT-to9V convertor
> cable could directly power more than one PF motor by adding
> two 9V to PF cables.
Perhaps I didn't explain that as well as I thought. I was just talking about
controlling a single PF motor using a single NXT output port. The requires,
currently, *two* different conversion cables: one that will connect into an NXT
output port, and terminates in a old-style 9V 2x2 electrical brick, followed by
the "PF extension cable", which can connect on one end to a old-style 9V 2x2
electrical brick, and on the other side to a PF motor.
Note I'm not talking about powering a PF *receiver* from the NXT, but powering
the PF motors directly (the same way you can from a PF battery box).
> You do not need two NXT-to-9V cables to power one
> PF motor though. That much I can see just by looking.
Agree. You need a NXT-to-old-style-9V cable, and a PF-to-PF-or-old-style-9V
cable. Two different cable types. And yes, i'd like to see a more direct
solution as well :) .
--
Brian Davis
>
> Cheers ...
>
> Geoffrey Hyde
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New TECHNIC sets for Fall 2008. Box images leaked!
|
| "Brian Davis" <brdavis@iusb.edu> wrote in message news:Ju8yBD.IqJ@lugnet.com... (...) Unless I'm mistaken, and you're talking about rewiring the PF/NXT connectors, I do not see that a NXT-to9V convertor cable could directly power more than one PF (...) (17 years ago, 7-Jan-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
57 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
