Subject:
|
Re: Studless Technic models
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:32:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2708 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Jindrich Kubec wrote:
> "Kevin L. Clague" wrote:
Hi Jindrich,
Thanks for your open minded responses.
<snip>
> > I for one will be very unhappy if you somehow make LEGO stop creating studless
> > beams. If LEGO were to stop making studded beams, I would be equally upset.
> >
> > Does it *have* to be an exclusive decision?
>
> Nooo, I like the studless beams. Just I don't think it's good to make
> studless-only sets as they're too different and you need totally
> different approach while building them, making it less
> flexible/compatible.
I guess my long winded post was unneccessary......
Wimpy beams have been getting a lot of grief lately, so I guess I had pent up
energy about that.
Wimpy beams provide no new assembly problems than studly beams. Joining two
studly beams with 6 pins is hard, exactly the same diffulty as with studless
beams.
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Studless Technic models
|
| Hi Kevin, (...) I think this misunderstanding arose from my bad pidgin english, I should have stressed that 'only studless' phrase. (...) I've recently re-built my 8479 Barcode Truck - this is a 'traditional' set and I can bet, that taking few first (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
| (...) Agreed, and I wrote that in my original message. (...) Agreed. (...) Peeron is down right now. I'll try to do a search as it goes up. But looking in the 2003 catalog, none of the 'Technic' sets seem to have them. Don't know about Bionicle/Star (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
