 | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) Love the ISS! The snowboard ramp looks fun too... Kecia (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) Name: Eric Sophie aka Nickname: Legomaster, e Age: 32, 33 - July 31 2003 Sex: Male,I'm trying really hard not to make a joke here. :P Location: The Garden State - New Jersey Civil status: Engaged, house, and new paving on my driveway. Hope to (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) i know ppl don't like to be summarized but i couldn't stop myself (...) :)) me too (...) enough! the smile was to "more" :) (...) no :( (...) 1028..250.000 (...) don't laugh at me plz i know many ppl measuring their bricks by kilos (kg) (...) (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) Oh, we're being summarized :) (...) Hoho, I still have some years until I'm average :) (...) And why the triple smiley to that? I'd like more females, two is not enough! BTW? Has Jennifer answered yet? (...) Correctemundo! It's the scientific (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) Even more pictures appeared... (URL) in the German forum the photographer added this comment (added translation below): Ich habe ganz einfach gefragt ob ich denn fotografieren dürfe und dies bekam ich darauf zu hören: "fotografieren Sie soviel (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.space) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9IqBA.99@lugnet.com... (...) hi it's a little summary of us :))) BEGIN Filled in form (edit his part) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...-+-+-+-+-+ Name: lugnet .technic member Nickname: AFOL Age: (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) Actually, in my opinion, if the set were named Columbia, it would be a bigger seller, as it would now be a souvenir, or memorabilia for this recent tragic event. Sales-wise I'd call it unlucky. Just my $0.02 worth. Play well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I love the age posted on the helicopter box (4403). 0-99!!!! Yay! Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
"TJ Avery" <tjavery@texbrick.com> wrote in message news:H9qHFq.JFL@lugnet.com... (...) Now THAT'S what I've been waiting to see :-) I figured Technic was not completely dead; just seeing what is in the 2003 Pitsco gave me some assurance. But that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
This stuff is great!! I remember about three years ago, Lego said it would be about three years before they could begin emerging from the Junior Age. I've been waiting patiently for this to actually occur and am pleased that they stuck to their (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) get my money. Just wish I didnt have to wait 6 months to get it tho :( (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | orrery update
|
|
My Orrery page has been getting a lot of hits from the link on Andrew Lipson's page (Thanks, Andrew!) so I thought I'd let people know I've added the LDraw files and put up some other projects at (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
Now that's a bit of irony, those space sets. Imagine if they had chosen Colombia instead of Discovery... Regardless...SWEETNESS!!! Except for the continuing death of studs in Technic, this year's line rocks! Those sculptured noses, those boxcar (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) it just wouldn't go nearly as fast, which is something I am, at least for this project, not prepared to live with. Also, the solar panel is nearly 2 kilo's, with the car at 900 grams, of which like 260grams is taken by the wheels, that would (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
"Gillish" <gillish@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:H9qLwq.9uJ@lugnet.com... (...) sunny (...) exactly (...) same (...) That is a very powerful solar panel compared to Lego Solar. It would be interesting to build a larger chassis and see if you (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
Pretty cool... I really like the new age marking 8-99 !!!...!!! I wonder how well the space shuttle will sell.... Frank Buiting <felsir@chello.nl> wrote in message news:H9qMuF.CFy@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
Looks like Lego were lucky when they picked the name for the Space Shuttle... Duq "Frank Buiting" <felsir@chello.nl> wrote in message news:H9qLpD.92L@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: MAN in ...blue
|
|
(...) Mumble...mumble...,may be an interesting improvment, why not !!!! (...) In Zwolle our main dream was a photo with you and ours models in your hands... .... we hope in Legoworld 2003!!!! From October, we had restiled some particular and add (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new electrics
|
|
no but new sets are using less and less bricks which are replaced by more and more liftarms so... regards pixel "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrdel6pe6uy.fsf....uio.no... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new electrics
|
|
(...) Are you saying that LEGO has officially said that it shall discontinue the production of technic bricks with studs? Fredrik -- (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
(...) (URL) Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) oops, forgot to crosspost to trains and starwars. (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) I've tested the solar panel some more today, and I've messured it giving 8 watts to the lego motor now, at 15:15 in the afternoon on yet another sunny winterday in Holland. I can only wonder what it would give in mid summer...unfortunately the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) More pictures: (URL) guess these pictures also interest starwars and train fans. -Frank ps. when discussing the models on the pictures, please keep discussion in the correct groups. (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9qI0r.L0v@lugnet.com... (...) i know but i would fall in trauma seeing this at my model :))) (...) but it would be nice to have them all stronger :) just dreaming pixel (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | new electrics
|
|
hi according to lego is going to make only studless technic bricks i propose some new electric elements i suppose lego designers will make it right but the main idea is here (post moderation) (URL) links) (URL) know lego politics is to not use (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I agree, that truck is cool and I'm actually going to have to go out and buy a NEW Lego set (The backhoe), at full price, haven't done that in a long while. So much for those doom mongers who said Technic was dead. Well done Lego. Steve (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
*trimmed lugnet.robotics* (...) That was easy, wait 'til I get my page on broken LEGO up :) (...) I suppose you refer to the ones made by Bram: (URL)let's say just liftarms (not bricks) (...) I think axels and gears are of a higher priority. However (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I don't think it was leaked but YAY! Oh, and the Backhoe is still nice :) /Tobbe (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) comeback). I hadn't seen that one before. I guess I was too focused on the set with 9-cylinders :-) TJ (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | new 2003 sets
|
|
take from lugnet.year.2003 rick cuijpers send (URL) i suppesed new pneumatics appears pistons without brick at the bottom and valves without studs (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
how could you?!?!?! :))) sometimes i imagine that lego will move whole technic branch to aluminium or so :))) i saw brick 2x4 made from aluminium let's say just liftarms (not bricks) maybe it's good point to start :) pixel "Tobbe Arnesson" (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | JoyBricx is released
|
|
Hi, all, I make the program named JoyBricx for remote control Spybot and RC Fighter (#8539 Manas.) using USB LEGO Tower. You can remote control the robots, playback, save and load operation by this program. Before, I made the LTremo76, but it was (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
(...) To brake your heart, here's some photos: (URL) when I putted some gears into boiling water: (URL) not forget TJ's page about broken gears: (URL) end of page) :) Best, /Tobbe (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
(...) But of course! (...) It's notthing to strive for :) (...) Thanks! I've done a mod to the 8457 main model but will try the dragster when I dismantel the modified version. Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
hi you know lego is my best toy so when i hear that ppl say "gray ash appears" my heart is broken when i build model i'm using it very gently i'm not leaving it working to see what will heppend after 15 minutes continues working and of course when i (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | MechMouse. Another use for the MicroScout
|
|
Hi All, After building MechCat ((URL) I noticed I had an extra Microscout that came with the Dark Side Developers Kit. So I found a use for it, Mech Mouse: (URL) you're interested, I included the LDRAW file and building instructions. (URL) Hystad (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
"William Howard" <william@howard-fami...rld.co.uk> wrote in message news:NFBBICINOLKHMIO...d.co.uk... BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How to use TowerApi.dll without TowerApi.lib
|
|
Hi, again ! I am sorry. I uploaded the imperfect file. I changed the USB LEGO Tower setup and have examined in the state where it is not a standard. Already, I fixed the bug, please download again. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Stefano Prosseda writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) doubt it'll give that much power but then again, half of it would be enough anyway. The size of it is 364x364mm, so it's rather larger than your lego panels combined. When loaded it gives about 16-17 volts. I've messured ~16.5 volts at ~0.35 (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
"Gillish" <gillish@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:H9L3vr.6xo@lugnet.com... (...) very (...) Your transmission looks very good. I am curious about your solar panel. My experiments with the Lego Solar Panels were successful but I don't think I (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
(...) If you ever get around to do it, photos would be appreciated. :) I have no motor to fix so I can't experiment. By the way Tobbe, I like your set reviews a lot (on your homepage). The first one I ever read was the 8457 power puller. I strongly (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
Sounds great! I would also like to see a bunch of .jpg photos. The transmission is something I'd love to see in detail and details on the solar panel you're using would satisfy a curiosity(sp?) as well. Keep us updated. ---...--- Nathan Falslev (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) I don't have any 'real' photos, as I don't have a digital camera. The .ldr files come from MLCad, and for me they work in LDview too. Maybe you can try those. (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Bram Lambrecht writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) Hi Gillis! Welcome to Lugnet. Your project sounds very interesting, as the 8880's major flaw has always been the difficulty in motorizing it. The quicktime 3d images are cool, but do you take any photos of the completed model? (in JPG) ? I (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
As a school project I'm building a small car powered by a solar panel. It should come as no big surprise that I'm doing this with lego. :) I started out with the 8880 chassis (without bodywork) motorised by an old style 9V motor. The project is (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: hovercraft
|
|
(...) One of the benefits of being a PC Technician is you get lot's of computers OnLine and often get 30 minutes of "spare" time waiting for installations or simply don't have any work assigned for the moment. /Tobbe (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
Comment: I see that most people have added a "Job" field. So I've included one too, even though it was not present in the original form. BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson writes: Hello! Out of curiosity I start this thread and hope to bring a few lurkers to the surface :) BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: hovercraft
|
|
(...) thanx tobbe you are "more online" than me :))) regards pixel (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: hovercraft
|
|
(...) My guess is 2003-01-28 :) (URL) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
<<snip>> One of mine new 9V motors have stopped working, oh, well, I imagine it will still run but I can't turn the shaft by hand. I e-mailed LEGO and they sent me a replacement w/o questions. I still have the broken one so I might try to fix it (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
I still have every motor I ever bought. One runs a bit rough, but still does the job. I consider the LEGO low-speed geared motors to be one of the key components that make the entire system viable. Because they have such capabilities we often use (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot Arm Help - Gearing Techniques - FAQ
|
|
(...) Well silly me, but I forgot a XFUT... these techniques for providing sturdy heavy load bearing rotating joints have applicability to trains too! If you like to build lift bridges, you know that having the bridge weight pinned to the gear (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.faq, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot Arm Help - Gearing Techniques - FAQ
|
|
Hi Lar! Good Idea for setting the XFUT. It didn't cross my mind. Thanks! e (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot Arm Help - Gearing Techniques - FAQ
|
|
Hey Eric, good stuff! I've XFUT lugnet.faq so Cary is aware of it and can consider it for inclusion in the overall FAQ... (he doesn't always see every potential FAQ if you don't crosspost there, IIRC) Thanks for sharing. Because the quoteminder is (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Robot Arm Help - Gearing Techniques - FAQ
|
|
Hey all, I get messages all the time from people asking for help, tricks and tips on building Robot Arms and Gearing Schemes. I put this together for a fellow builder and I thought it may be useful to others. Enjoy, and please let me know if any of (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Robot and R/C Competition reminder
|
|
BricksWest 2003 is only a few weeks away, and that means *ROBOT COMPETITIONS*! Well at least for some of us. Remember, there will be prizes for all these competitions, so it will be worth your time to enter! Check earlier postings by me or the (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.events.brickswest, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: hovercraft
|
|
(...) So, when do we get to see pics of the latest creation?!?! :-) Simeon (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
|
... this is a reply to a message (I don't remember where I read it, I think it's in robotics, and definitely don't remember the one who said that) saying that Technic motors were basically consumable, and that person said he has lost 2 motors in the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, David Koudys writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) Name: Simon Matthew Bennett Nickname: Psi Age: 31 Sex: Male Location: Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK Civil status: Eh? - Would 'single' be the right answer? Homepage/BS-account: N/A yet (no time) Lugnet member number: 958 Approx. amount of (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Øyvind Steinnes writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Blank form (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- Name: Stephane Simard Nickname: Plague Age: 27 Sex: M Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada Civil status: Single Homepage/BS-account: Lugnet member number: 1869 Aprox. amount of bricks: (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) Sounds like Jennifer Clark's younger sister :-) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Rebecca Taylor writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Jonathan Wilson writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Philohome site moved...
|
|
Hi everybody, I had recently to change my site hosting, it is now available again on (URL) already used this domain name, but it was a simple redirection showing my host address. Thanks to those who had links to my site looking like (URL) to modify (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Cool site
|
|
Anyone been over to Joe's site in a while? (URL) Site! e (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
Hello! Out of curiosity I start this thread and hope to bring a few lurkers to the surface :) BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: My neverending truck-project...
|
|
(...) while. (...) i'm 28 but i know we have older friends here pixel (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02
|
|
rosco you are right i've seen it before i'd like to see movies :) but thanx for reminding me this MOC tobbe don't press me too much... :) i've been talkin by myself that hovercraft isn't possible to build but now it is done... nothing is UL built (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: My neverending truck-project...
|
|
(...) I believe there is a difference between growing up and maturing :) (...) Dunno, I'm 24 so it can't be me :) I'll start a Rollcall, it's been a while. /Tobbe (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02
|
|
(...) One thing that could be done is a paraglider, that is a form of parachute with motor, propellor and controls hanging under it. Or a normal V-shaped glider. You need to look in the UL-range of "planes" though. What about a flying replica of the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: My neverending truck-project...
|
|
hi Oyvind it's always attract to build separate parts and then joint them together but IMO... let's say when i built acceptable part i try to build it in not join but build in it confuses me sometimes because i have to rebuild big part of model very (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: My neverending truck-project...
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9ExBo.EF8@lugnet.com... (...) you are using my own words tobbe :))) (...) wheel (...) this (...) in a (...) I (...) so I (...) same (...) could (...) fourth (...) much (...) could (...) (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: Biopede...Trying to understand Bionicle
|
|
In lugnet.build.mecha, Gregory Muri writes: <snip> (...) Yikes!! That thing is pretty wicked!! You seem to do pretty well building with Bionicle. I've found that building with Bionicle is like weaving. You have to fill out the empty spaces with (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02
|
|
(...) Well you could start with something like this (URL) and go from there..... ROSCO (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: CyberMaster
|
|
"Steven B. Combs" <stevencombs@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:H9G6yn.LwI@lugnet.com... (...) MIB. Good buy or no? Don't know much about the price level, but remember that the CM is not for serious robot-ing. The memory is quite small, there's (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: CyberMaster
|
|
Good sugestion! Thanks for the help and reassurance! Steven (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing Mech Cat
|
|
Dean, Thanks for posting the instructions on Brickshelf. I'm looking forward to building a version when I get back home. Sorry for my earlier post. I'm inexperienced with MLCAD and I had not upgraded to the newest version. It works fine now. Thanks, (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: CyberMaster
|
|
in my opinion yes it's a good buy. last year if i remember correctly they were going for $100 at brickswest. i sugest grabing it but insisting on free shipping. ondrew (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: promissed hovercraft ver02
|
|
maybe is it going to be a new thread lego glider :) i suppose the structure can be enough light and strong but the problem is to make good profile of wings and propellor (because i'd like to build a plane) and of course the main issue is remote (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
