Subject:
|
Re: My neverending truck-project...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:37:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1587 times
|
| |
|
|
hi Oyvind
it's always attract to build separate parts and then joint them together
but IMO... let's say when i built acceptable part i try to build it in
not join but build in
it confuses me sometimes because i have to rebuild big part of model very
often
that is why it's really cool to have as many bricks as possible
to be able to build 2 versions of model at one time :)))
it gives me an ability to look at old version and eventually return to it
when i was building my car seat i had 3 of them in different "evolution
states"
try to make a suspension in non standard way
i mean try to place shock-absorbers parallel to the chassi
try to move differentials up or forward/backward
you had used so big wheels so you have to be able to put everything inside
whatever it is
regards
pixel
"Øyvind Steinnes" <senniets@online.no> wrote in message
news:H9Drv9.7wr@lugnet.com...
>
> "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message
> news:H9CGnn.4A9@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.modelteam, Øyvind Steinnes writes:
> > > I'm a bit stuck now in this project. I now thinking of going back to • start
> > > and try again with a more simply construction. Here can you see how far • I
> > > have got until now:
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=28498
>
> > My advice: ask Jennifer Clark, aka "Master of fitting maximum • functionality
> > into small spaces" 8?)
> > ROSCO
>
> Jennifer Clark webpages was the one of the sources that gave med the ideas
> for this project. And I thougt then that I got do it too... but I may be
> wrong :)
>
> I think I have done too much shrinking of the mechanism, and put to much
> effort in making the diffrential and suspension as narrow as possible. So
> now I'm a bit stuck with a very compact design were nothing can penetrate.
> Not even a shaft from the motor to the tipper lifting mechanism, and its
> hard to make it smaller to get some room for other technicaly nifty • gadgets.
>
> But I have seen a few things now, that gave me some ideas. I think I have • to
> make the body/chassis a bit wider, so I can put the motors inside the
> chassis.
> It is a bit hard to take photos of this chassis, first of all because it • so
> compact and second because it is black. It is hard to see what parts go
> where in the photos now.
>
> What I need now is some advice:
> Is it best to let the sub-parts of the car be rigid in them self so you • can
> make an lighter chassis. Or is it better to make small an light sub-parts
> and make an stronger chassis so when all parts are together it is rigid
> enough ?
> Like my truck; its made of several sub-parts;
> differential+steering+suspension in front is one sub-part,
> diffrential+suspension back is two other sub-parts and the tipper and the
> crane is other sub-parts.
> Maybe its wrong to start with these sub-parts at all?
>
>
> Regards
> Øyvind Steinnes
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=Phoenix
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My neverending truck-project...
|
| "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:H9CGnn.4A9@lugnet.com... (...) start (...) functionality (...) Jennifer Clark webpages was the one of the sources that gave med the ideas for this project. And I thougt then that I got do it (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
