To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 25183
25182  |  25184
Subject: 
Re: The Flame and The Lance
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 04:41:46 GMT
Viewed: 
1112 times
  
In lugnet.space, Andrew Saada wrote:
  
   are a better use of the parts... this one will be dismantled to make way for other stuff.
Nooooo!


I’ll be making two micro-scale ships from the parts of this one, you know.

  
I actually like The Flame better, everything from the ribbed levels to the technical apertures. As Paul Hartzog also pointed out, the sectional pattern on the bottom is excellent detail that could have been overlooked.
When reading the first snippits of feedback as in Gil’s post I thought, “Hangars? He also built microsized hangars?” Then upon seeing the aft view pic I was like “WOW, that’s awesome!” The whole design of the hanger in The Flame is spiffy, not to mention the takeoff strip! Someone asked about the hangars on The Lance and, correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems they’re embedded, thus hidden, in each side--what a great idea!


It’s all about the hangars. The hangar design for the Lance is meant to be economical, with well-protected bays to launch fighters effectively.

   In lugnet.space, Paul Hartzog wrote:
   And the central gray struts are angled in opposite directions which has the
   unique effect of making the lighting on the moc look like a zigzag on
those > areas. Did you do this deliberately or was it an aftereffect?
I noticed this as well and would like to know the answer.


I intuitively expected and alternating visual effect, but the rest is serendipitous.

   Also, excellent choice on the color schemes, and have I seen that Exploriens ship before in minifig scale?


You have, and you probably will again - as soon as I take some more pictures of it.

Cheers,





Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Flame and The Lance
 
(...) Nooooo! (...) I think it's safe to say perfect. Paul, These are terrific! I think Gil covered it: In lugnet.space, Gil Shaw wrote: (...) But I think what does it for these, besides the incredible detail and overall form, is the interplay of (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

68 Messages in This Thread:






































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR