To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 25140
25139  |  25141
Subject: 
Re: The Flame and The Lance
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:11:46 GMT
Viewed: 
1217 times
  
In lugnet.space, Paul Baulch wrote:
  
Never again. It was a labour of love (all 1.2 metres of it), but the affair is over... It was fun to build, and I was glad to make a microscale (space)battleship with the features it has, but there’s just too many things wrong with big ships. They’re kind of interesting to build once, but they’re a pain to transport and an even bigger pain to photograph. Not to mention one could really make at least two ships that are just as interesting and are a better use of the parts... this one will be dismantled to make way for other stuff.
Nooooo!

   This is my favourite MOC, far and away. It only took a short time to build, it was pure inspiration all the way. My greebling was better than usual, too.
I think it’s safe to say perfect.

Paul,

These are terrific! I think Gil covered it: In lugnet.space, Gil Shaw wrote:
   -snip- There is simply too much to drink in all at once. Smacking me square > in the face is the incredible effect the hangers have on establishing scale...they are works of art in themselves.

-snip- Thanks for sharing these mobile building schools.

Just incredible Paul.

But I think what does it for these, besides the incredible detail and overall form, is the interplay of various textures. From smoothe to coarse, ribbed to angled, it works so well! I love this pic:

I actually like The Flame better, everything from the ribbed levels to the technical apertures. As Paul Hartzog also pointed out, the sectional pattern on the bottom is excellent detail that could have been overlooked.
When reading the first snippits of feedback as in Gil’s post I thought, “Hangars? He also built microsized hangars?” Then upon seeing the aft view pic I was like “WOW, that’s awesome!” The whole design of the hanger in The Flame is spiffy, not to mention the takeoff strip! Someone asked about the hangars on The Lance and, correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems they’re embedded, thus hidden, in each side--what a great idea!

In lugnet.space, Paul Hartzog wrote:
   And the central gray struts are angled in opposite directions which has the > unique effect of making the lighting on the moc look like a zigzag on those > areas. Did you do this deliberately or was it an aftereffect?
I noticed this as well and would like to know the answer.

Also, excellent choice on the color schemes, and have I seen that Exploriens ship before in minifig scale?
Keep up the excellent building!

-Andrew

And as Eric Sophie said, Ok, we need a 70’s graphic with you and an Afro!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Flame and The Lance
 
(...) I'll be making two micro-scale ships from the parts of this one, you know. (...) It's all about the hangars. The hangar design for the Lance is meant to be economical, with well-protected bays to launch fighters effectively. (...) I (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  The Flame and The Lance
 
(3 URLs) The Empyrean Flame> Never again. It was a labour of love (all 1.2 metres of it), but the affair is over... It was fun to build, and I was glad to make a microscale (space)battleship with the features it has, but there's just too many (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.microscale, FTX) !! 

68 Messages in This Thread:






































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR