Subject:
|
Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:34:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1052 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Luke Ma writes:
> AWESOME..I agree with todd here. I don't know where this should go but it
> should definitely be kept.
> I agree with some others' opinions that this does not necessarily benefit
> the lay reader to a great degree. However, I think that as people do more
> and more with Legos and create things that border on the abstract, this will
> be a great framework within which to think.
Definitely a great foundation started by Damien - it is tools like this that
allow hobbies to evolve into something bigger.
i.e. If an expert builder were to formally train novices, a language like this
would be crucial.
Or, it could allow all kinds of ways to quantify our models: perhaps the ratio
of ornamental to constructive constructors would be the greeblie factor, the
number of constructive constructors would be the complexity... Neat-o!
Jeff J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
