Subject:
|
Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:18:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1562 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Luke Ma writes:
> AWESOME..I agree with todd here. I don't know where this should go but it
> should definitely be kept.
> I agree with some others' opinions that this does not necessarily benefit
> the lay reader to a great degree. However, I think that as people do more
> and more with Legos and create things that border on the abstract, this will
> be a great framework within which to think. I could see this being a great
> planning tool for geometric or abstract objects/scupltures in lego where the
> number of constructive surfaces vs. decorative elements will be huge and the
> only good way to design it would be to perform a quick analysis on it using
> the guidelines you have written out (I see constraint problem optimized and
> lagrange multipliers...but then I'm a dork). Anyway, thanks again for
> letting us know. I hope somebody with a stable website can keep/archive
> this.
> Luke
>
> "Damien Guichard" <damien.guichard@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
> news:H00sGo.3w4@lugnet.com...
> > Hi Jon Palmer,
> >
> > I also have designed a "space building standard" concept.
> > It is not designed by a group.
> > It is of a much finer granularity (brick level).
> > It is also somewhat terse so I expect no popularity.
> >
> > http://brickcaster.multimania.com/misc/building_calculus
> >
> > Nevertheless, I want to submit it to www.classic-space.com as it's the
> > natural place for it, how should I proceed?
> > Then I would remove it from my site.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Damien
Thanks Luke,
You have seen the real issues of building categories.
Not giving lessons. No fan needs or wants lessons.
But revealing some of the magic we call imagination.
Knowing productivity better and yet knowing nothing more productive.
Regards,
Damien
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
