Subject:
|
Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:54:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1040 times
|
| |
|
|
AWESOME..I agree with todd here. I don't know where this should go but it
should definitely be kept.
I agree with some others' opinions that this does not necessarily benefit
the lay reader to a great degree. However, I think that as people do more
and more with Legos and create things that border on the abstract, this will
be a great framework within which to think. I could see this being a great
planning tool for geometric or abstract objects/scupltures in lego where the
number of constructive surfaces vs. decorative elements will be huge and the
only good way to design it would be to perform a quick analysis on it using
the guidelines you have written out (I see constraint problem optimized and
lagrange multipliers...but then I'm a dork). Anyway, thanks again for
letting us know. I hope somebody with a stable website can keep/archive
this.
Luke
"Damien Guichard" <damien.guichard@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:H00sGo.3w4@lugnet.com...
> Hi Jon Palmer,
>
> I also have designed a "space building standard" concept.
> It is not designed by a group.
> It is of a much finer granularity (brick level).
> It is also somewhat terse so I expect no popularity.
>
> http://brickcaster.multimania.com/misc/building_calculus
>
> Nevertheless, I want to submit it to www.classic-space.com as it's the
> natural place for it, how should I proceed?
> Then I would remove it from my site.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Damien
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
