To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 21487
21486  |  21488
Subject: 
Re: More Speed? Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:43:35 GMT
Viewed: 
2206 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
  
  
   So, please tell me what else the RCX needs and what other sensors would be good to have. I’ll still take mechanical improvements, too. Thanks.


As far as the RCX goes and in concert with most other respondees, more resources are really what’s needed. In order of importance to me, I think I/O followed by memory capacity followed by CPU speed would do it for me.

I can see the need for more I/O from the RCX, but I really don’t understand why everyone thinks it needs more memory and CPU speed.

I’m interested to hear about any projects that people have attempted which required more of either.

I like using NQC because of the simplicity of downloading byte code based programs onto the Lego firmware environment.

Using NQC, the CPU would need to be at least 10x to 100x faster to run the kind of programs I would like to run at an adequate speed. Since there isn’t enough memory, I can’t run them anyhow which is why I asked for more memory and more speed.

What kind of programs?

Mapping.

The average chair leg is what - inch x inch. And my house floor area is how many square inches? That’s how many memory locations I would like to address.

JB



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More Speed? Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
 
(...) This could be addressed on the existing hardware with a better programming environment. What I have in mind is a new NQC compiler that generates a firmware file instead of a bytecode file. So you would code in NQC (or something like it) and (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  More Speed? Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
 
(...) I can see the need for more I/O from the RCX, but I really don't understand why everyone thinks it needs more memory and CPU speed. I'm interested to hear about any projects that people have attempted which required more of either. Steve (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)

44 Messages in This Thread:


























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR