Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:26:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2024 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jordan Bradford" <bradfj23REMOVE_THIS_SPAM_THINGY@uwosh.edu> wrote in
message news:HnsHtA.12z9@lugnet.com...
> I'm giving a presentation about Mindstorms on Wednesday. I have a slide • near the
> end that talks about all the stuff I know people want to see added. Here's • what
> I have so far:
>
> RCX
> ===
>
> * RC communication (but keep the IR port, too)
> * more I/O ports
> * faster processor
> * more memory
> * bring back the AC adapter jack
> * DCC for use with LEGO Train sets
>
> New / Improved Sensors
> ======================
>
> * more sensitive / better light sensor (can see color, not just light • intensity)
> * more sensitive rotation / angle sensor (especially at very low or very • high
> speeds)
> * motion / distance / proximity sensor
> * pressure sensor
> * sound sensor
> * magnetic sensor
> * gyro or compass direction sensor
>
> Mechanical Things
> =================
>
> * servo motor
> * solenoid
> * helical gear
>
> What else do people want to see? Don't worry too much about mechanical • TECHNIC
> stuff, like different gear sizes or gear blocks. For example, I'd like to • see
> some helical gears created, but that's more of a mechanical issue than a
> Mindstorms issue. I don't know what else people would want for robotics • besides
> a servo motor and possibly a solenoid, anyway.
>
> So, please tell me what else the RCX needs and what other sensors would be • good
> to have. I'll still take mechanical improvements, too. Thanks.
I'd prefer a DC connection over AC. Maybe a connection that accepts both.
Most cheapo adapters you buy in electronics shops are DC. I've heard stories
about rectifier diodes burning when used with a DC adapter which is not the
kind of robust design I'd expect from Lego.
Communication with Micro Scouts. I've read horror stories about how to use
the P-program on the Micro Scout. Please make that easier.
Interfacing with pneumatics. I've no detailed ideas on how to implement
this, I'll leave that to the experts. What I mean is RCX controllable
pneumatic switches. The only way now is to use a motor, which is kind of
awkward.
Better speed control for motors. There's not much difference between the
possible speeds at the moment.
Overall the most important is more I/O.
Best of luck with your presentation!
Duq
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
| I'm giving a presentation about Mindstorms on Wednesday. I have a slide near the end that talks about all the stuff I know people want to see added. Here's what I have so far: RCX === RC communication (but keep the IR port, too) more I/O ports (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.trains, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.edu, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
