Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:37:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2054 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Chris Magno wrote:
> IM(very)HO, I've always felt a more distributed modular "brick" would be
> the way to go, AND still follow the original design of the concept of
> the core brick.
>
> these guys are my inspiration:
>
> http://www2.parc.com/spl/projects/modrobots/chain/polybot/g3.html
>
> for a future RCX, some sort of standard "block" with on board smarts,
> and enough power to run 2 motors, and 2 sensors.....
>
> want more motors, (or memory, or I/O port) snap on more blocks.
I agree that a modular approach would be both more Lego-like and more userful.
Say a processor unit, a display unit, an input unit, a hub, and a memory unit
accepting CompactFlash cards. Let everything run off standard Lego 9V, so you
could use a standard Lego battery box or train speed regulator instead of
needing a big, unwieldy unit with a battery compartment. Connect everything
with standard Lego wires, but perhaps design modules frequently used together to
click together. Voila.
TWS Garrison
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
| (...) John, (and group) IM(very)HO, I've always felt a more distributed modular "brick" would be the way to go, AND still follow the original design of the concept of the core brick. these guys are my inspiration: (URL) a future RCX, some sort of (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
