 | | Worst of the worst
|
|
I invite you all to know the pettiness and cruelty that is Timothy Gould: (URL) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support) !
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) with my pastiche go and post them there where the image is posted. This cross-forum linking is sad, cowardly and nothing more than an attempt to garner some support from new lugnet members after irritating or abusing almost everyone who has (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Legoswami (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) These forums are not the place for this sort of thing, but Eric should not have to defend himself against such childish abuse on any forum. (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) While I can understand your desire to jump in with a general defense of Eric against what would ordinarily be considered bad behaviour I would recommend you check background before doing so in future. He has threatened me on this forum with (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) You repeat your childishness to no effect. (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) As soon as Eric acts like a adult, then perhaps we will treat him like one. After the last blast of manure smelling mixture from him, if someone wants to mock him on JLUG (where he had/has a account), then he is fair game. If you want to be (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | A simple inquiry (was Re: Worst of the worst)
|
|
(...) May I inquire politely as to the nature of Lugnet's policy on sockpuppets? I would consult the ToU but I feel in this case it's best to ask administration directly. Soren (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Dear Admins, I have my strong suspicions that this is a puppet account for Eric Sophie. The strange use of phrasing and language of this response matches his very closely and the name used is further suggestive of a puppet account. I would ask (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) suffered genuine losses such as the death of friends or family is shameful. You suffered no loss besides perhaps a blow to the ego over a parody of something you made. Grow a thicker skin, stop acting like a spoiled child, and get over it (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) what you are doing is hateful and insightful. You have spent enough time in your life trying to aggravate me. Spend your time doing positive things. Live your life for good purposes. If I have drove you to create such ugliness, then I am sorry (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Hello James, nice to meet you, I think. (...) James, when is soon enough for you in your tainted eyes? You are advocating Tim's behaivor. You are not helping to bring about understanding. Hate begets more hate. (...) Suspect all you want. I (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Tim, I made an error in including a sketch from the IRON MECHA contest on a sales graphic. You in turn made it your personnal war on me. In the melee you took the oportunity to go on and on quoting the TOS. Since it came from you, I paid you (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) you're wearing that shirt. I'd ask if you could use it on your website! I will say the .sig is rather tasteless, but that's Tim's problem (since it's on all of his posts), not ours. JohnG, GMLTC (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: A simple inquiry (was Re: Worst of the worst)
|
|
(...) May I inquire politely as to the nature of your involvment in this? I have asked you many times to knock off the petty bickering and team disparagement you engage in. You are a talented man Mr. Roberts. Lift your soul and the fibers of your (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) You coming out of the wood work to find something wrong with me rather than write about why I posted is shameful. Your allegiance shows. You (...) "lugnet.people.support– All about LEGO® people going through or survivors of crises (cancer, (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) My name and my “strange use of phrasing and language” are my own I commented on this issue as I believe I recognize the behavior being demonstrated by some of the people on this forum. I have been involved in resolving many cases of (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Arthur, thank you for taking the time to write this and to do so with a clear head. If you are willing, we need such an arbiter. I give my word that I will not engage in malicious activity. I am to isolated to even have anyone to chat with let (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
--SNIP-- Well I wasn't going to respond but I think I just have to. I feel caught between a rock and a hard place here. On the one hand I realise that responding will make me look bad but on the other hand I know that remaining silent will allow you (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Arthur, thank you for taking the time to write this and to do so with a clear head. If you are willing, we need such an arbiter. I give my word that I will not engage in malicious activity. I am to isolated to even have anyone to chat with let (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Dear Admins, In light of this response I retract my statement. Tim (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Yes, of course, because everyone who says ANYTHING you don't like is part of a giant orchestrated conspiracy against you. Paranoid much? (...) I stand by my earlier statement. It is not abuse. I take "Abuse" in the charter to mean verbal or (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) What have I done recently to deserve your piracy of my images? Please just stop it already. (...) I am doing this; standing up to you, because no one should be treated like this. I am doing this because you hate me and I want it to stop. I am (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) My apologies. It read just like something Eric would write. (...) Do you use statements like "You repeat your childishness to no effect." in your professional capacity? I certainly hope not since that is one of the least professional responses (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
Come on Jeff, what Tim did was wrong and no one should be subject to that kind of piracy and foul treatment. Nothing more, nothing less. I'd like to hear your lofty opinion of them apples.... Eric Sophie (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
Tim, your problem is with me leave him alone. I have had no interaction with you since the Qwelder-Mech episode. Yet you take the time to prolong and exaspirate the fued we seem to have. You took my image without permission and used it in a mean and (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) No piracy involved Eric. Brickshelf, Jlug and yourself are hosted in the US and are subject to US Fair Use provisions to copyright law. I am based in the UK and subject to UK Fair Use provisions which are broader than US ones. If you wish to (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
That file has been deleted. (URL) Mylegomaster wrote: Please delete the above file. I did not give permission for my image to be copied and manipulated by this user. timgould (21920) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: A simple inquiry (was Re: Worst of the worst)
|
|
Eric, get a clue! You brought this round back to lugnet yourself. A smarter man would either laugh and ignore the insult or do some kind of damage control. If someone had done something like this to me I'd be doing some research to see why people (...) (18 years ago, 13-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) If something happens in jLug's back yard that offends you, then deal with it there. Don't bring it (yet again) back into LUGNET!!! I'd ask an admin to remove or cancel this entire thread, but that'd lead to other issues. Dave K (18 years ago, 13-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) When you start acting like the adult you are. I don't even get the point of the photo, frankly. (perhaps it is because I am not a artist, just a lego builder). All it looks like to me is someone photoshopped a outline around your body... (...) (...) (18 years ago, 13-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) All I have been doing recently is building my Blue Quad. That got pretty well ignored. For the last couple weeks I have been building Mech Bay 11. I am not looking for trouble. I posted new Rizmit Graphic Art. I pretty much keep to myself. I (...) (18 years ago, 13-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) I feel safer and more out in the open here. Also, when I am accused of certain fallacies, people can monitor my behaivor. Likewise, people can see the nonsense that is directed towards me in an effort to provoke. I promise you, speak my name (...) (18 years ago, 13-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Eric, You know I love all your stuff. I've always been amazed at hthe complexity and sheer 'wow' factor you build into each of your creations. That said, bringing up stuff that doesn't concern the general LUGNET audience--especially something (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: A simple inquiry (was Re: Worst of the worst)
|
|
(...) Bringing it "back" was not my motivation, showing others that I get hassled even when I keep to myself was. (...) Perhaps a different man would. This man has had enough. Manipulate my image and I will say something and I will point it out in (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) distress. In my opinion it violates the terms and conditions of this site and should be removed. Believe it or not, I was once flamed in a comics forum! Should I post a complaint about that to Lugnet? No. So stop parading your petty squabbles (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) spirit of this group's charter. -Suz (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) 1) It has nothing to do with LUGNET. Eric, why in the world do you think this is OK? 2) This is a topic from a different forum. That forum is completely separate from LUGNET. Once again, why is it brought here? 3) This is a personal attack in (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
Then I will let it go and not do it again in the future. I think my jlug account is dormant. I can't seem to log in there. Either way, more than one person has asked me not to post problems from other Lego Fan boards here, so I will respect the (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | enough useless noise. (was: simple inquiry (was: Worst of the worst))
|
|
(...) Eric, With that "logic", should I post here about the woman at the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles who gave me a hard time the other day? How about a PITA Brickseller? How about when rude comments are made about me over in (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people.support) !
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) but this one just kept nagging me. So for better (or probably worse) here it is. Eric please explain this: Feb 8, 2003 When told by Rich M "He has been having personal issues at home that he may not like to talk about in public." you responded (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Tim, you have a Lugnet account. If you were truly not being petty and sly, you would have posted the picture here. Free free to talk all the trash you want, but be a man about it - don't cross-forum link your pastiche behind his back. (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Because I have no desire to start a flamewar on Lugnet. It's called respect for other people. There is a forum for that sort of thing: Jlug. You should know it well since it's where you post 95% of the time. Tim (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) I think that's what started this all (again) in the first place. None of you has any respect for each other. If you were my kids, you'd *all* be going to bed without dinner. I don't know any of the parties involved. I've never met any of you. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Your JLUG account is just as it was when you last posted, maybe you forgot your password? If you did, and wish to login there, please contact the admins to reset it. ROSCO (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) ...or for the rest of us who read Lugnet, the vast majority of whom I would bet don't care one jot about these individuals nor their petty reasons for lobbing mud at one another here. (...) I mostly agree with you, Elroy, except that I'd go so (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) Although I fully intend to ignore Eric as much as possible in future and wasn't the one who brought this to Lugnet in the first place I have to give some advice to you and others who complain about pointless flamewars: don't read (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
In lugnet.people.support, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) Well, I do admit as of late that I've been slacking in my postings... That said, I was #11 for post count in 2003, and thereabouts for a few years... (...) The issue is that it shouldn't (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Hi Dave, Just to clarify this isn't directed at you. You argued it should never have been brought here which I fully agree with. You never once said it should be deleted or locked which is where I take issue. Tim (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
Bryce, I really have nothing to say to you on these matters. Let's move on and just continue to build. Thank you. e (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) If your comments were directed at me, then you are absolutely right. I don't post to the forums much. That doesn't mean that I don't read them. Anyone who knows me in person knows that I'm generally a pretty quiet guy. It says a lot that I've (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Hi Elroy, I hope that my comment didn't come out harsher than it was intended. I'm pretty passionate about free speech and probably come across ruder than I intend to. (...) I agree with this. To be honest I really regret adding that comment. (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Seriously children, stop throwing sand, no one cares, all this pettiness, of which Mr. Sophie seems to always be smack in the middle. Please do this community a favor and permanantly block lugnet.org from your webbrowser. Scott (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
Would an admin please either: 1) ban these folks who want to make their personal squabbles (on other boards!) public here? OR 2) at least remove this thread from the front page spotlight? Barring that, please edit the home page to remove the tag (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
In lugnet.people.support, Elroy Davis wrote: [snip] (...) [this entire incident aside] I'm not sure if thread locking is even do-able. I think it was talked about a few months ago (privately). Jerry would know if it's possible, and then it would be (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Okay, here's the big issue: LUGNET is based on an NNTP server, and the news system does not support such a thing as thread locking, since threads are only made up by matching subjects (and some header info) in the very first place. Enhancing (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) What about making the server reject any new posts to a thread, either through the web or NNTP? It again wouldn't be the most elegant solution, but I'd imagine it would be doable. (...) I think the easiest way would be adding some negative (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Hi Jerry, Would it be possible to move threads? If so you could have a naughty threads section .off-topic.threads or something similar which people could ignore and which would remove the problem for NNTP and web users? Tim (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Good point, Jeff - actually something like that appears ideal: User opinions are very important when it comes to the spotlight feature, so we probably want exactly this option: To be able to move a topic out of the spotlight upon request, or (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) I don't think NNTP supports moving either, but even if it did, it would be unlikely to work, as people using SMTP/NNTP already have the message with its old headers, including the newsgroups, so when they reply it would still go to the old (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) I really think this is something that LUGNET members can sort out... if they really want it sorted out. 'Worst of the worst' has three spotlights... and it is in the main page highlights. How difficult can it be to spotlight ten things more (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
Agreed! (but not spotlighted!) I just went through announce.moc and highlit a few items, maybe we can push the unpleasentness off the front page. (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Agreed. As a new member with high expectations from this most "friendliest" of locales, I would like to let you all know that viewed from "the outside"(i.e. folks with little or no Lugnet experience) this type of garbage does not speak well of (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) No, I think you're wrong and users need a way to counter spotlighting in cases like this. Your post is another example of why a post needs an option to downgrade it. Some people who agree with you have gone and highlighted it. Now it looks (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) If people now highlight your post they are saying they agree with you rather than Richie. Thus his system would work. With a negative spotlight you allow people to treat things negatively without giving a valid alternative which is needlesly (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) No, you misunderstand. You spotlight stuff you want to see spotlighted. Spotlight a post of a MOC that you like, or an event you're interested in. You don't have to spotlight a "counter view". If you don't want my post appearing in the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) Not quite, and it's not my system - it's the system we have now, and it's a system that will work if we choose to use it. If the community doesn't want this sort of stuff highlighting, then they need to highlight the things that they want to (...) (18 years ago, 16-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) I think I agree with some of this - my point, Tim, was that spotlighting shouldn't end up being used to vote on an issue because it just forces more dross into the spotlighted list. If someone thinks something is worth highlighting, but a lot (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst of the worst
|
|
(...) The Spotlight feature has been in place for what, five years or more now? And "petty aguments" and the like *consistantly* get in the front page spotlight. I think this is proof enough the current system doesn't work. You're saying "all people (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
|
