Subject:
|
A simple inquiry (was Re: Worst of the worst)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:05:35 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
6923 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people.support, Arthur Clarke wrote:
| |
In lugnet.people.support, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
While I can understand your desire to jump in with a general defense of Eric
against what would ordinarily be considered bad behaviour I would recommend
you check background before doing so in future. He has threatened me on
this forum with violence before and generally acted like an egotistical
twit which is why I feel no guilt whatsoever in mocking him elsewhere.
Sorry to make an example out of you but this is precisely why I get annoyed
with the sort of post he just made. It’s designed to draw ignorant people
like yourself (meant in a non-malicious way) into his defense.
Tim
|
You repeat your childishness to no effect.
|
May I inquire politely as to the nature of Lugnet’s policy on sockpuppets? I
would consult the ToU but I feel in this case it’s best to ask administration
directly.
Soren
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A simple inquiry (was Re: Worst of the worst)
|
| (...) May I inquire politely as to the nature of your involvment in this? I have asked you many times to knock off the petty bickering and team disparagement you engage in. You are a talented man Mr. Roberts. Lift your soul and the fibers of your (...) (18 years ago, 12-Aug-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
69 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
