Subject:
|
Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:12:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1342 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
> Im calling on those in the rtl robot building community to show your
> support and express an interest in this game for the GAMES sake.
Either way, with HITWs or with open topped hoppers, I'm all for this game,
and think it'll be a good challenge. I think part of the challenge will be to
make a good EOAT to deposit DNA, while at the same time building/programming the
'bot to be easy, ie. slutty.
Come on people, we've done hard games, and easy games (puns intended). More successful games, and less succesful games. With more entries, or with fewer entries. BUT THEY'RE ALWAYS FUN!!!
I think we may be able to add some tweaks or whatever to the rules between now
and February to make the game less dependent on pure dumb luck.
BTW, Steve, if you want to bring in a shoebox, fine. With lid or not.
But with the multiplication scoring rule....hmmmmmm.... 0 times (whatever is in
your shoe box) still equals 0.
Anyways, just my 2.314158 cents
John
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
| (...) so much to say.... so little time. ---...---warning all caps ahead---...--- THIS IS NO LONGER ABOUT THE TEE HEE FACTOR. THIS IS A GOOD GAME, WITH A LOT OF COMPLEX MECHANICAL AND PROGRAMING REQUIREMENTS. IF IT MAKES YOU FEEL BETTER, THEN RENAME (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
