To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 14817
14816  |  14818
Subject: 
Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:32:33 GMT
Viewed: 
4814 times
  
On 9/27/05, Greg Hyland  wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishenwrote:
> > I completely disagree that the rings were an end-run around the game
> > rules.  They were about the BEST interpretation of the contest, based
> > on the rules set.
> > 
> > Ever heard the phrase KISS?
> > 
> > It seems that when someone manages a battery-box solution to
> > accomplish what other need an RCX, everyone says "oooohhh what a good
> > job.... how clever".  So why use an RCX if a battery-box solution will
> > work?  Why use a battery-box if a stored energy solution will work?
> > Why use a stored energy solution if a simple machine will work?
> 
> Except this is a Mindstroms robots group. I want to see Mindstroms robots
> being
> used. Not just a LEGO contraption. It's like what Chris said in another post
> here, I want to see robot enteries and LEARN something from them. RCX robots
> are
> neat. I'm in a group to see RCX ideas at work, not see who can find the clever
> loophole.  Sure your idea -- a-hem, I mean your daugter's idea -- was clever
> and
> valid, but in the long run I liked Dave's robot better. So if making rules
> that
> you have to have something motorized is bad, well, heck, while were at it, why
> bother using LEGO? Why limit ourselves to that? Why can't I just go over to
> the
> balance beam and lift up with my arms? I'd win! I'd win against your -- I mean
> your son's -- tower for sure!
> 
> Oh, because how fun would that be?


Greg - I agree completely!  My point was not that we should endorse
loophole entries or trivial entries, but encourage contests that lend
them to an RCX solution.

I also liked Dave's bot the best.  It was well designed and
exceptionally cool to watch.  But IT DIDN"T USE AN RCX EITHER!!!!!

-Rob A>



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
 
(...) Except this is a Mindstroms robots group. I want to see Mindstroms robots being used. Not just a LEGO contraption. It's like what Chris said in another post here, I want to see robot enteries and LEARN something from them. RCX robots are neat. (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

43 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR