Subject:
|
Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:50:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
845 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, September 27, 2005 9:43 am, Chris Magno wrote:
> Steve Hassenplug wrote:
>
> > On Tue, September 27, 2005 9:30 am, Chris Magno wrote:
> >
> > > yes, we COULD blow off the HITW part, and make it open topped. BUT then
> > > i get to see people show up with a shoe box. yay me. (that was sarcasm)
> >
> >
> > This makes no sense. It ONLY means the shoe box must have a lid.
>
>
>
> if your shoe box has a LID steve, then how do you propose to get the
> blocks on the inside?
Sorry I didn't totally explain it. My shoebox also has a couple HITWs.
I guess if you can't build an autonomous robot that out preforms a box, the best
thing to do is outlaw boxes. ?!?
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
| (...) Yes, but if the scoring is the number of your blocks in other unique 'bots times the number of other unique blocks in yours, a box can't win--no blocks going into others... That said, if you have your box able to get blocks into other 'bots (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
| (...) ok you lost me now. IF your shoe box has a lid and a HOLE in the WALL (HITW) then why are we arguing??? you just described my rule set of a closed hopper with a HITW. ????? (confused) (...) using daves original idea, a shoe box is a VERY GOOD (...) (19 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
43 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
