To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 9464
9463  |  9465
Subject: 
Re: National nouns (was:Americans, North Americans, Americasians)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 1 Jun 2002 05:22:20 GMT
Viewed: 
1034 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:

  n.b.: The term "tribes" is very pejorative.  Sorry, it's a pet peeve.
        If you want to know why, I can elaborate over in .debate, complete
        with links.

Perhaps I'm confusing American Indian practices where I've always understood
it to be okay to use the terms "tribe" or "tribal".  Perhaps I'm relying too
much on my Apache co-workers, who don't have a problem with "Indian" either,
(beyond of course that it is a silly term in the first place).  It has never
been mentioned as being perjorative.  For that matter, this is the first
I've heard that it was perjorative in relationship to Africa (and I'm sure I
would have gotten an earful from my wife if she thought it was perjorative).

But heck, it ain't like I haven't been wrong before!  I'm certainly willing
to listen to your reasons.  :-)

Bruce



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: National nouns (was:Americans, North Americans, Americasians)
 
(...) Check this if you want to see who lives in the CAR and what languges they speak: (URL) best LFB n.b.: The term "tribes" is very pejorative. Sorry, it's a pet peeve. If you want to know why, I can elaborate over in .debate, complete with links. (23 years ago, 31-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

52 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR