Subject:
|
Liberal Media (was Bush Knew?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 May 2002 13:38:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
278 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> I don't like Bush (I don't have to--I'm not American). That said, I'll give
> him the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise, though
I'm American(1), and I don't like him either, but I'll likewise give him
the benefit.
However, a number of right-wing demagogues in the media *still* gripe
about Clinton as if he's *still* busily destroying the entirety of the
universe, but not a peep from these righties about Bush's nebulous
involvement in pre-9/11 knowledge or, for that matter, Enron. I truly hope
that our President is 100% clean in both of these issues, but if either of
them had happened during Clinton's administration, would the so-called
"liberal media" have been so restrained in its eagerness to crucify him?
Even (or especially) during wartime?
Just a thought...
Dave!
(1) I know, I know--everyone likes to say "You're not American; you're
*United Statesian*" Nuts to that--through college and business and travel
I've had occasion to know several dozen non-US citizens, *all* of whom
without exception referred to citizens of the United States as "Americans."
That's not a huge sampling, I grant you, but it's enough to convince me that
it's okay to call myself American.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bush Knew?
|
| (...) (URL) points out that knowing that *some* terrorist attack *may* happen *somewhere* and knowing that a bunch of insane moronic idiotic lower-than-life infidels hijacking planes with knives and such at 8 a.m. on Tuesday September 11, 2001 , are (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
