Subject:
|
Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:27:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
815 times
|
| |
|
|
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message
news:I4CF8K.GxD@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeff Pelletier wrote:
> > Many bisexual women identify as Lesbians for political reasons...
>
> This is a question for anyone who has an educated opinion...I seriously • don't
> know.
>
> Why does it seem relatively more common for women to be openly bi than • men? I
> know lots of bi women, relatively few bi men, and more gay men than • lesbians.
> Is that a coincidence of my own singular experience, or a trend? If there • are
> more bi women than men, is it just because of the relative level of social
> acceptance or is it more acceptable for women _because_ there are more of • them?
> It seems like a tricky chicken or the egg kind of problem.
Hmm, the difference in acceptability could be due to a difference in
function. Cynthia pointed out that many male animals use homosexual sex as a
dominance game. Her example of female homosexual sex was suggested to be for
bonding. That would suggest males would feel threatened by homosexuality
more so than females.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) This is a question for anyone who has an educated opinion...I seriously don't know. Why does it seem relatively more common for women to be openly bi than men? I know lots of bi women, relatively few bi men, and more gay men than lesbians. Is (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
