Subject:
|
Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:07:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
847 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeff Pelletier wrote:
| |
Many bisexual women identify as Lesbians for political reasons...
|
This is a question for anyone who has an educated opinion...I seriously don’t
know.
Why does it seem relatively more common for women to be openly bi than men? I
know lots of bi women, relatively few bi men, and more gay men than lesbians.
Is that a coincidence of my own singular experience, or a trend? If there are
more bi women than men, is it just because of the relative level of social
acceptance or is it more acceptable for women because there are more of them?
It seems like a tricky chicken or the egg kind of problem.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:I4CF8K.GxD@lugnet.com... (...) don't (...) men? I (...) lesbians. (...) are (...) them? (...) Hmm, the difference in acceptability could be due to a difference in function. Cynthia (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) John asked a simple question which I think is a common misconception. It can be summed up with a few definitions which should help clarify (and these definitions are scholarly, you can disagree with them if you wish - I'm just putting out (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
