Subject:
|
Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:23:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
456 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Jeff Pelletier wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > Please vote!
> >
> > http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=174
> >
> > FUT - Lugnet.admin.general
>
> I have a big problem with the way this poll is worded - its definitely one sided
> and misses the point of the 200+ postings on the main topic forum. It was
> explicity noted several times that "sexual topics" were NOT going to be
> discussed and that most everyone found the posting of such topics inappropriate.
> The point of the group is to discuss MOCs or Lego issues related to LGBT issues.
> This may be a surprise to you, but you don't have to have sex to be gay. That
> distinction really needs to be made.
With wording like that, there is probably an internship at Fox News awaiting.
What next a poll on apple pie, the flag and motherhood ?
The lynch mob had better keep an eye on the 'singles' newsgroup, who knows
what tales of conquest await us from the retail aisles.
> And if you can't even be bothered to read (a rather lengthy mind you) thread
> then its completely absurd for you to post a poll which references it.
>
> Just my two cents.
pete.w (add my 2 and the kitty has 4 cents)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) I have a big problem with the way this poll is worded - its definitely one sided and misses the point of the 200+ postings on the main topic forum. It was explicity noted several times that "sexual topics" were NOT going to be discussed and (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
