To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20061
20060  |  20062
Subject: 
Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:16:51 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
128 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Pedro Silva writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
I opposed getting into this war but now that we're in it I want to win.
Unlike some here, I suspect, who would delight in an American defeat.

An American defeat is not an option (1); but the victory may be Pyrrhic if
this thing goes on through the Summer and/or with an ever increasing rate of
casualties - in many ways, that could be even worse than a defeat. :-/


Pedro

(1) - Really, it isn't. If we admit the (absurd) hypothesis that Iraq may
win, we'll easily predict the world economy sinks even deeper in the current
crisis, which is global and not US-only. So even the most fierce opponents
of this war are aware that once started, it has_to_be won by the coalition -
the alternative suits noone.
Realpolitik at its best... it took me a while to understand *why* there was
such a war-hunger in DC for six months, but now it is clear as water it was
an ingenious move. Disgusting, but ingenious nevertheless.



Larry and Pedro,

You both touch a chord,

I desperately want this war to be done with. I married, and am raising
children in a Quaker home, and I am comfortable with pacifism. Richard Nixon
was a Quaker. I am a pragmatist. I want a quick ending to an internationally
disruptive war and am a proud son of a decorated WWII pilot who never quite
recovered from his experiences.

It takes a strong leader to avoid unprovoked war and a weak one to lead a
country into unprovoked war. I am only one individual in a free speaking
society. Iraq is a country ruled by a ruthless tyrant who should be deposed.
There are other countries in this mold. My country is lead by a well-meaning
Christian who is unable to communicate his vision to the rest of the world.
We fight them. They are us. We are humanity. I weep for collateral damage. I
hope our president has made the right decision. I hope the world forgives us
for trying to better the world without effectively communicating to the rest
of the world our motive.

I take no stance in this conflict. I am powerless to make a difference.
Instead, I stand with the collateral damage that is the true wound of war.

I am a pragmatic pacifist. We are a strength, not a  weakness. Choosing to
fight is the weak way out of any conflict unless there is no other choice.
Then we hope for a quick resolve. I hope for the people of Iraq,
Afghanistan, Burma, North Korea, etc. that there is a quick way out. I hope
our leaders vision is the right one. I will not fight or try to slow a quick
resolve to this conflict. I see no reason.  I will protest a poorly thought
out strategy. In war, only hindsight is well thought out strategy.
Therefore, I wait and pray to God, Buddha, Jesus, Allah, and other religious
and non-religious entities. Only the future will tell.

Legot!


Bert Waters



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
 
(...) An American defeat is not an option (1); but the victory may be Pyrrhic if this thing goes on through the Summer and/or with an ever increasing rate of casualties - in many ways, that could be even worse than a defeat. :-/ Pedro (1) - Really, (...) (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

29 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR