Subject:
|
Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 02:41:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
285 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
>
> Oh no! Not the "should we have dropped 'the bomb'" debate again?!? No,
> despite lame attempts at recent revisionism, we had no way to know what
> Japan intended beyond its action
Wrong. http://www.doug-long.com/
> (which were that the war was going to
> continue to the absolute bitter end).
Wrong again.
> The Emperor in fact could not
> surrender until he had some face-saving way of doing it.
Ah at last something approaching reality! 1 outta 3 aint bad.
> Viola! Did him a
> favor.
Whatever you reckon.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
|
| (...) 1: I read the site before I posted, and for that matter I read the site the previous time this came up. You may wish to actually quote the exact passage that you are refering to, since what I read would seem to support me. 2: Unsupported (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
|
| (...) Oh no! Not the "should we have dropped 'the bomb'" debate again?!? No, despite lame attempts at recent revisionism, we had no way to know what Japan intended beyond its action (which were that the war was going to continue to the absolute (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
