To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20052
20051  |  20053
Subject: 
Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:11:21 GMT
Viewed: 
250 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
If Iraq turned into the democratic ideal and the shining star of the region,
the loss of life and goods may end up having been worth it.

Can you cite even one example of where this has happened before?  Where else
have we bombed people into accepting democracy?

True, the absence of precedence doesn't make the occurrence of such a
democracy impossible, but I would suggest the likelihood of such an outcome
is almost nil.

I assume that you are discounting the two blaringly obvious examples for a
reason?  Germany?  Japan?  The latter we did literally bomb into submission
(WoMD, to add some irony).


However, recent evidence suggests that the emporer was about to surrender,
and that you yanks dropped the bomb to show the world your power.


Given that logic, I'll stick with my "accomplice after the fact" statement.
If you didn't support the war, now is a good time to support strategic
withdrawal.  After all, our best intelligence is so far proving itself to
have been wrong.


That we have committed this far (foolishly) it would seem a waste at this
point to have caused such havoc to no good end.  Get Saddam and be done with
it, at least it would be a Pyrrhic victory rather than a complete
ignominious defeat (Bush may deserve the latter, but the troops don't).

Agreed

Dave K


-->Bruce<--



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
 
(...) Deja vu all over again. IIRC we had this debate already. I forget what the outcome was... but I don't recall that statement coming out a clear winner. (22 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
 
(...) I'd say we pretty close to literally bombed Germany into submission also... (...) Whatever the truth is here, it certainly is a case of warring them into submission, and then going in and setting the groundwork for a respected, productive (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
 
(...) Oh no! Not the "should we have dropped 'the bomb'" debate again?!? No, despite lame attempts at recent revisionism, we had no way to know what Japan intended beyond its action (which were that the war was going to continue to the absolute (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My Concession (for John mostly)
 
(...) I assume that you are discounting the two blaringly obvious examples for a reason? Germany? Japan? The latter we did literally bomb into submission (WoMD, to add some irony). (...) That we have committed this far (foolishly) it would seem a (...) (22 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

29 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR