| |
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> My point is merely that talking about economic systems and whether
> redistribution is a good economic policy is not on-topic for
> market.theory, it's more properly a topic for .debate
I willing to concede that - you are generally well intentioned, if somewhat
abrasive. However, your reply to John (quoted below) doesn't say that. It
says (paraphrasing) that Richard probably isn't worth talking to.
> I just delivered that message in the endearingly charming way I have.
> That's all.
Hmm. Not to criticize (no never!), but that 'endearingly charming way' you
have is sometimes less than endearingly charming.
I think that Richard has a point here: he was being unfairly jumped upon.
Quoting various people from various places in this thread:
Richard: "in an/my ideal world(tm),..." "Theoretically we could..." "Note that
this isn't a moral judgement - I'm not saying that you should do that, or that
you are wrong by not doing it..." "That's just my decision though and I
awknowledge that yours is just as valid."
John: "Grow up!" "This is total and complete nonsense." "Don't try to impose
some insane system to try and make it that way!"
Larry: "Richard's thinking is so muddy and his premises so out of touch with
reality that it may be a waste of time to even talk about this any further..."
> Just my opinion, I don't run things around here, Todd does. (crowd
> heaves a vast sigh of relief)
Like Larry, just an opinion, I don't run things around here either. (crowd
heaves a slightly less vast sigh - I'm not as notorious as Larry <duck & run>)
(1)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
1:Sorry Larry, couldn't resist.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
52 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
