Subject:
|
Re: Is it possible to have too much LEGO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:25:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
731 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Troy Cefaratti writes:
> > You don't have too much Lego, you just need a better system for sorting :)
> >
> > Silas
>
>
> Actually, i'm pretty anal about the sorting. Just about everything is
> sorted down to part type and color. I've got TONS of plastic containers for
> this.
>
> The problem was that the part I was looking for was from the part of my
> collection from when I was a kid and was a part that I didn't think that I
> would ever use in anything. I have a box specifically for these type of
> parts. Which I couldn't find!
>
> Perhaps I have too many boxes of sorted parts! I'll have to figure out a
> way to sort my sorted boxes!
Nah, what you need to do is organize your boxes of sorted parts, catalogue them
into an index, then database your index, and arrange the results
cross-referencing to your original list, and sort the output. ;)
FUT lugnet.geek.babble
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Is it possible to have too much LEGO?
|
| (...) Actually, i'm pretty anal about the sorting. Just about everything is sorted down to part type and color. I've got TONS of plastic containers for this. The problem was that the part I was looking for was from the part of my collection from (...) (25 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
