Subject:
|
Re: Is it possible to have too much LEGO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:12:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Troy Cefaratti <mnementh@{ihatespam}nacs.net>
|
Viewed:
|
758 times
|
| |
|
|
> You don't have too much Lego, you just need a better system for sorting :)
>
> Silas
Actually, i'm pretty anal about the sorting. Just about everything is
sorted down to part type and color. I've got TONS of plastic containers for
this.
The problem was that the part I was looking for was from the part of my
collection from when I was a kid and was a part that I didn't think that I
would ever use in anything. I have a box specifically for these type of
parts. Which I couldn't find!
Perhaps I have too many boxes of sorted parts! I'll have to figure out a
way to sort my sorted boxes!
Troy
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Is it possible to have too much LEGO?
|
| (...) Nah, what you need to do is organize your boxes of sorted parts, catalogue them into an index, then database your index, and arrange the results cross-referencing to your original list, and sort the output. ;) FUT lugnet.geek.babble James (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Is it possible to have too much LEGO?
|
| Ah yes the "I'm never going to use these pieces" bucket. I've got one of those, and it is confusing. I also have the problem with the pieces that I rarely use since I can't remember quite how I sorted them. Silas Troy Cefaratti wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
