Subject:
|
Re: Enough trans-antifreeze!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 02:43:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1654 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> As far as the L&S Element, I've got four of the things--and very little idea • of
> what to do with 'em. I think they'll become underbody "main guns" for the
> starborne equivalent of torpedo bombers (slow and torpid, but with a mean • punch
> against heavies). Non-violent? I'm afraid not, but I think an armed galaxy • is
> a polite galaxy. ;)
>
> best,
>
> Lindsay
I am building the heavies. Mine has four 360 range L&S cannons and various
other weapons. The Launch Command L&S Element (4 so far) serves as drive
engines for the beast. Mostly I am working on the super-structure, interior
and vehicle bays. Got no pictures now and I am being derailed by(buy) Castle
projects and fatherhood. My crew and spacemarines (aqua-dudes
w/modifications) are assembled and awaiting orders...
Need...more...bricks...Gahgh!
Aaron
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Enough trans-antifreeze!
|
| (...) I don't have anything with that kind of armament, but the "concept ship" Marathon still had a nice bit of punch. (four spots with 360-degree coverage? without shooting the ship they're on? I'd like to see that, it must be some layout!) I have (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Enough trans-antifreeze!
|
| (...) I had the StarBird--the coolest part aside from the engine whine was the way the ship came apart! Play value, and how. But do any of you remember the "counterpart" to the ship--the black one named the "Intruder" or "Invader"? Same concept, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
