Subject:
|
Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:28:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1234 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.19990722100743.00a18cd0@pop.osiriscomm.com...
> > > But submodels which have no moveable parts -- should they be inlined or
> > > included in the MPD? Pros/cons?
> >
> >
> > Include them in the .MPD. That way if someone wants to print instructions
> > with submodels separated out, they can.
>
> Ok. So would it be safe to say absolutely no inlining whatsoever?
Submodels used for ease of ldrawing may certainly be inlined. Also, I would suggest that we not make the subfile structure a
requirement, but a "strong suggestion." I'm sure there are many sets which have already been modeled and inlined. I'd want to see
these models included in the OMR, with the understanding that if someone submits the same set with proper subfile structure, it
would replace the first.
-John Van
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) Though 'OMR' would denote a submission to the OMR, etc, it would be better to have a separate group so there is absolutely no question what is a submission and what is not. All we need is for an editor to pick up a non-submitted model that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
