To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 363
362  |  364
Subject: 
Re: OMR Submission and Storage
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 19:07:55 GMT
Viewed: 
1113 times
  
At 02:01 PM 7/22/99 , Jeff Stembel wrote:
Include them in the .MPD.  That way if someone wants to print instructions
with submodels separated out, they can.

How about two versions:
1.  Follows exactly the instructions (Only substeps are submodels)

2.  Modelling Version (Only moveable parts are submodels)

Good idea.  So I take it someone who submits a model specifies which it is,
and they also get to choose which version they model.  But what if we have
too much of one type, and want to balance it out?  Should they be required
to do both?

And the moveable parts are submodels version has to follow the best
possible solution to making the entire part moveable in one angle change...

-Tim <><

http://www.zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org
AIM:   timcourtne
ICQ:   23951114

Get paid to surf the web!  Visit:
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=DGO655



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: OMR Submission and Storage
 
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) No. If it's unbalanced, so what? The main advantages of .dat files of official models will be present for either version: the ability to view a model from any (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: OMR Submission and Storage
 
(...) Ok... (...) Heh... would be nice, but that's one of the little features I haven't been able to figure out yet in my pea-sized brain :) I'm sure not everyone else has either. Could that be one of the model editors' things to do?? -Tim <>< (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: OMR Submission and Storage
 
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) We might as well use models.sets for this, and just have authors include "OMR" in the subject header. This will avoid the confusion that would come with two (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

34 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR