Subject:
|
Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 19:01:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
816 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, John VanZwieten writes:
>
> Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote:
> > - Submodels must reflect submodels in instructions or must reflect movable
> > part features on the model
> >
> > But submodels which have no moveable parts -- should they be inlined or
> > included in the MPD? Pros/cons?
>
>
> Include them in the .MPD. That way if someone wants to print instructions
> with submodels separated out, they can.
How about two versions:
1. Follows exactly the instructions (Only substeps are submodels)
2. Modelling Version (Only moveable parts are submodels)
Jeff
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) We might as well use models.sets for this, and just have authors include "OMR" in the subject header. This will avoid the confusion that would come with two (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
