 | | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) So, by your own logic, the classic helmets should be: (...) (I personally think the above makes more sense, incidentally. None of the helmets have chin straps, because that would have to go under the chin.) On a side note, are those supposed (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'm partial to Chin-Guard. A chinstrap is a miniature belt that braces itself against your chin to hold your helmet onto your head. A chin-*GUARD* on the other hand protects your chin. (...) I like the inclusion of Castle. But we should (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) And they lived happily ever after... :-)))) (...) Chin-Guard or Chinstrap? (...) suggestion: x527 - Minifig Helmet Castle with Chinstrap and Wide Brim (...) w. (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'd like to reach closure on this in preparation for the next parts update. I have re-thought my decsion about 193+593 vs. 193a+193b, mainly in the light of the Classic Window discussion, where we are allowing suffices on 3DNs. And I also take (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Perhaps the above mentioned (and other similar) parts would best be called "wedge plates". Wedge due to the shape and plate due to the thickness. There is such a variety of shapes and shapes there will always be exceptions to whatever (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 3 new primitives for Technic Link Chain Old [DAT]
|
|
I forgot to include the three new primitives, I created for the Technic Link Chain Old: 3-8ring1.dat 3-8ring5.dat 3-8rin12.dat 0 Ring 1 x 0.375 0 Name: 3-8ring1.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 Unofficial Primitive 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 4 16 1 0 0 0.9239 0 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: Technic Link Chain Old [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Link Chain Old 0 Name: x.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp <nkp@dds.nl> 0 Unofficial Element 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 rect.dat 1 16 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat 1 16 0 0 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat 1 16 8.5 7.5 16 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) By this metric, (URL) not a wing. That's reasonable. If 2413 were a wing, then so would (URL) they are the same shape, essentially. (...) I agree. There are, however, times when that is not possible---for example, (URL) undoubtedly similar (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Another point to consider in differentiating between a wedge and a wing. IMHO a wing is not symmetrical and has a matching counterpart (left & right) and would be inherently thin. I cant imagine building a plane model with a wing as thick as a (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: curved monorail track
|
|
(...) I know, this is a late reply, but I've finished it. The "Monorail Track Curve Quarter" (2672) is at the tracker now. (URL) Bernd (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Doh! I posted without reviewing the current conventions. I suppose I could have inferred that the correct orientation puts the narrow (or corner-less) edge toward the front along the long axis of the part? Thanks for the quick answer, though! (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Then you'd just use "Plate 4 x 8 Without Corner Left" and "Plate 4 x 8 Without Corner Right" -Orion (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) If LEGO were to produce a rectangular plate, say a 4x8, with a missing corner, what would be a good way to describe it? The part could easily have a mirror-image part, so it wouldn't be enough to say "Plate 4 x 8 without corner," since that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) This one should be Wing 3 x 4 (...) These ones are plates with one corner clipped, I think the 'Without Corner' label is better than Wing. I'd like to add these ones to the list: 2621 2625 I had renamed 2625 while it was on the PT for BFC (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) How about these two: 30033 Plate 2 x 2 with Rod Frame Octagonal (URL) 30094 Bar 4 x 4 with 4 Studs (No entry at LUGNet) I suggest changing the last to: 30094 Plate 2 x 2 with Rod Frame Rectangular Christian (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) The following official parts do not follow this rule: 4859 32059 2401 2450 2419 30503 6106 (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) In general, a wedge is a 'clipped' brick and a wing is a 'clipped' plate. I don't see any exception to this rule in the official library but if an exception exists on the PT then those part should be commented upon. -Orion (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dishes are Round (Cornbread are Square)
|
|
(...) Yes, I thought I had checked the inclusion of these keywords. I'll recheck them. Chris (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) I agree that some parts still need renaming. Those you mention are good candidates for an overhaul. We do rely on them getting reviewed quickly on the Parts Tracker. When a part is submitted to the PT for a name change it should not be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dishes are Round (Cornbread are Square)
|
|
(...) I think so, yes. Because many people look them up with "Space" in their mind. That is why I started this discussion in the first place. Jaco (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
"Niels Karsdorp" <nkp.nkp@hetnet.nl> schreef in bericht news:HsIEAw.1sur@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) I totally agree with Niels here (again :-) There should be a better way for naming parts. Jaco (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Naming of parts
|
|
I think more parts need to be renamed. Recently I was looking for the large excavator arm, did not find it among the parts starting with an E (like the small 3314 Excavator Arm 2 x 6 x 2), did not find it on the PT searching for 'Excavator', so I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dishes are Round (Cornbread are Square)
|
|
(...) 1. Will they still be considered part of the Round category? (I.e., will they then need a "0 CATEGORY Round" meta-statement?) 2. Won't they need "Space", "radar", and "round" added to their lists of KEYWORDS? Thnx, Franklin (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dish 2 x 2 (4740.dat)
|
|
(...) After some offline discussion with Steve Bliss we have decided that the dish parts will all be named "Dish ...". I'll be fixing the names of the parts on the PT and searching out any that remain to be fixed on the official library. Chris (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3035p01.dat - confirmation, it exists!
|
|
(...) Thanks Clark! Too bad that geocities.jp link is dead. That would have been so much easier to tell if the part had been red... Well, I think it is ABS. No sign of misforming, I'd say the stud logo is late 60's, higher and more modern than the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: File Size Concerns ( Was Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW))
|
|
(...) I agree. If I would reduce the decimal points the size would be reduced by 20k but then I get a lot of not coplanar vertices so that these needs to be split (increeses size) or have to store with the numbers. But the neighbour vertices needed (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3035p01.dat - confirmation, it exists!
|
|
(...) Yes it does exist. It was factory painted to match the wing. It's from set 310. I have a picture of that set MIB showing both parts with red edge paint. Gary Istok also mentions it: (URL) to me is the years Gary mentioned. The plate you (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3036p01.dat - Plate 6 x 8 with Red Side [DAT]
|
|
Must be from set 310. (URL) Plate 6 x 8 with Red Side 0 Name: 3036p01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Author: James Jessiman (Original LDraw Part) 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 60 4 40 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 40 4 40 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3035p01.dat - Please confirm that it exists! [DAT]
|
|
Could be somebody painted the red side to fit in with the rounded "wing" from some gas station set? But I think it's real. 0 Plate 4 x 8 with Red Side 0 Name: 3035p01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Author: James Jessiman (Original LDraw Part) 0 BFC (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: File Size Concerns ( Was Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW))
|
|
(snip) I think you're both right. I am reminded of a quote: "Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler." -Albert Einstein You're both geniuses too, you know. :-) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | File Size Concerns ( Was Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW))
|
|
(...) I agree with the elimination of excess but I disagree with a reduction in part quality simply because it is "too large" (...) I agree again. The point I was trying to make is size concerns should not be the only reason to redo a quality[1] (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) I agree with Thomas (and Orion, I think - although from his post, I'm not sure he looked at your reduced-size file) -- keep the original. If you are concerned about file size, you could try reducing the number of decimal places on your (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) I have to strongly disagree with this. If a file can be done just as well with fewer bytes, that's a good thing. Good for downloading, good for maintaining the part, good for storing the parts library. (...) I won't argue with your figures, I (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) You are right, that is no longer a problem. And the CPU(s) on any machine should render a 200k file as fast as a 10k file. The only aspect could be the up- and download time. But for a "perfect" part we shouldn't waste a thought on this. CU (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) If it's not broke why fix it? I think the one on the PT is just fine. The file size concern have gotten entirly out of hand. Let's do some math: Peeron has 3628 out of 5589 (64%) sets invertoried for a total of 8062 parts (this includes Moved (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) The one on the Tracker is far better. Saving 30% on file size is not worth it for the great degradation in quality. TWS Garrison (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Animal Tail Section end (NEW) [DAT]
|
|
I tried to reduce the filesize of the x378.dat actual on the tracker is this 98 kB file: (URL) is the new 69.5 kB file. Please tell me which one the better file is. 0 Animal Tail Section End 0 Name: x378a.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Part (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dish 2 x 2 (4740.dat)
|
|
(...) Actually, I thought that all the radar dishes were supposed to be renamed to "Round Dish. . ." (as indeed several on the Parts Tracker are); on the other hand, a name fix for 4740 has not been submitted to the Tracker, and the radar dishes (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dish 2 x 2 (4740.dat)
|
|
(...) OK, I have to agree with Niels now, but then I plead for all dishes that are now called Space Radar Dish to be renamed to Dish and put in the keyword "space" (for you spacers out there :-) Jaco (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dish 2 x 2 (4740.dat)
|
|
(...) It is not a space-specific part, it's used in town a lot, too. The name 'Dish 2 x 2' is better, because it says exactly what it is: a 2 x 2 dish, no more, no less. The keywords contain a reference to space and radar, so searching with keywords (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Dish 2 x 2 (4740.dat)
|
|
I was looking for the small 2 x 2 space radar dish, but did not find it in the Space categorie. Why has the description changed for this part to this: 0 Dish 2 x 2 0 Name: 4740.dat It was Space Radar Dish 2 x 2, which is IMHO better? Jaco (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) These two numbers (40391 & 40392) are the small s-curved neck/tail part. I opened one to look into it. So the four numbers above (40376 - 40379) get a higher chance to be the other neck/tail parts and the head. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mockup: win163b.dat - Window 1 x 6 x 3 Vintage without Studs, 3 Panes
|
|
The box along the bottom of window seams to be detached. (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Claw with Axle
|
|
(...) I'll have a look at the feasibilty of doing this part. If I think I can make it, I'll take a stab at it, no compensation needed. -Orion (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Claw with Axle
|
|
(...) These are pretty complex parts so I agree. I have, in the past, offered compensation to parts authors for creating parts I needed created. I don't recall where I made the offer but I think it was in the CAD hierarchy, not the market one. That (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Claw with Axle
|
|
(...) If I want to pay someone to create the part for me, is it still appropriate to post in the CAD forum or should I be posting to Marketplace? I felt uncomfortable paying someone, since LDraw is supposed to be a community effort. But I REALLY (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | New Mockup: win163b.dat - Window 1 x 6 x 3 Vintage without Studs, 3 Panes [DAT]
|
|
0 Window 1 x 6 x 3 Vintage without Studs, 3 Panes 0 Name: win163b.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Mockup 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 REM TE Extra lines at Pane separators 1 47 0 32 -2.5 57 0 0 0 0 32 0 1.5 0 box.dat 0 Inlined: 1 16 60 36 10 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Mockup: win163a.dat - Window 1 x 6 x 3 Vintage without Studs Plain [DAT]
|
|
0 Window 1 x 6 x 3 Vintage without Studs Plain 0 Name: win163a.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Mockup 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 REM TE Missing LEGO logo on glass front 1 47 0 34 -2.5 57 0 0 0 0 32 0 1.5 0 box.dat 0 Inlined: 1 16 -60 61 10 -1 0 0 0 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Mockup: win164 - Window 1 x 6 x 4 Vintage without Studs [DAT]
|
|
0 Window 1 x 6 x 4 Vintage without Studs 0 Name: win164.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Mockup 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 REM TE Missing LEGO logo on glass front 1 47 0 40 -2.5 57 0 0 0 0 40 0 1.5 0 box.dat 0 Inlined: 1 16 60 48 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mockup: door124a.dat - Door 1 x 2 x 4 Vintage without Studs Left [DAT]
|
|
Forgot two bars... Here's the complete version: 0 Door 1 x 2 x 4 Vintage without Studs Left 0 Name: door124a.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Mockup 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 REM TE The x-over and handle are sloppy sketched 1 47 0 40 -2.5 17 0 0 0 0 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Mockup: door124a.dat - Door 1 x 2 x 4 Vintage without Studs Left [DAT]
|
|
0 Door 1 x 2 x 4 Vintage without Studs Left 0 Name: door124a.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Mockup 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 REM TE The x-over and handle are sloppy sketched 1 47 0 40 -2.5 17 0 0 0 0 40 0 1.5 0 box.dat 0 Inlined: 1 16 20 48 10 1 0 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) Thanks for the information. I don't own the legs or the thick tail piece. So I couldn't see this with my own eyes. I only have some Baby (Young) Dinos. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) The dinosaur leg pieces also appear to be made up of a few parts. The one I'm looking at has the left and right legs (in green), a central plastic piece (in grey), and a metal rod joining the pieces. So 40384 could be the middle plastic piece. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) I could find out some numbers for the "Animal Dinosaur"-parts: 40376, 40377, 40378, 40379 (these numbers must be for the neck/tail sections, because of four numbers in a row and four neck/tail parts) 40384 could be the "Animal Dinosaur Head (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Downloading unofficial parts
|
|
(...) I just checked the ldrawunf file and it is current through today (Jan 16 2004) so it seems to be updating fine. -Orion (21 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Downloading unofficial parts
|
|
(...) It is the same problem again. Please update the ldrawunf.zip. Thanks M (21 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Bionicle Claw with Axle
|
|
I love working with LDraw files in MLCad, but am not able to create a .dat file. I have tried to wrap my head around it through FAQ’s and discussion, but I just won’t get it. I am creating a number of farm-related custom models. I like these (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Anybody working on 43121?
|
|
Anybody working on 43121? This is the engine housing from the Air Blazers set. Picture on Bricklink: (URL) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Help needed: Are these parts really LEGO? [DAT]
|
|
Got these parts in an eBay lot. I think they are original LEGO, but they may be a very early clone. I really like the "windoor" On one side it's a door, you flip it 180 deg's and it becomes a window! :) 0 FILE MODEL.LDR 0 Are these doors and windows (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove
|
|
(...) Hehe. For what it's worth, that meta only modifies LDView's behavior if the file isn't stored in the standard LDraw Parts directory. However, since I assume some people keep their unofficial parts out of their parts directory, it can be a (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove
|
|
(...) *lol* I had to read the header many times to see what you meant... :) /Tore (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) I think so. I don't actually have these parts, but I was just looking at some last Saturday. Here's a comparison pic (URL) TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove
|
|
(...) Wow, you weren't kidding about old. I assume the studs don't have logos on the real one, since you went so far as to avoid using the stud primitive. I've never seen the part, so the only comment I have isn't related to the geometry. Any (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Thanks! Well, it took some hours to make. (...) Oh. I didn't know there was a variant without cutouts. Do they look exactly the same apart from the cutouts? /Tore (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove [DAT]
|
|
Now we're talking *old* LEGO! 8-) 0 Brick 2 x 14 with Groove 0 Name: x717.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unufficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 KEYWORDS vintage 4 16 140 24 20 136 24 16 -136 24 16 -140 24 20 4 16 -140 24 20 -136 24 16 -136 24 -16 -140 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Looks nice. (...) 'Brick 2 x 4 Half Round with Cutouts' would fit in with 3063, 2577, and 30357. Alternatively, "Round Brick 4 x 4 Half with Cutouts" or "Round Brick 2 x 4 Half with Cutouts" (depending on how you look at it) could get the (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring [DAT]
|
|
At last, I lay my greedy hands on one of this rare, vintage macarony variant! I just had to LDraw it at once... A better name, anyone? 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring 0 Name: x716.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 KEYWORDS macaroni, round, (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Message to Paul Easter
|
|
(...) It must be because of my ISP's new email filters. Make sure your message says something like "ldraw" or "lugnet". They should make it through then. If not, I have emailed you using my backup email address. Paul (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Message to Paul Easter
|
|
Paul, I am trying to contact you using pneaster@knoxy.net but keep getting my E-mail back? Stragely enough it keeps saying user unknown and message undeliverable. Can you contact me, please? Jaco jmolen@zonnet.nl (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) I done it. Only the orientation could be a question. Steve please tell me a part-number for this. CU Bernd ---...--- 0 Animal Tail Section (Middle) with Pin 0 Name: Animal_Tail.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Part 0 KEYWORDS Dinosaur, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) I began the Tail Section with Pin. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) The tail sections are in my to-do-bucket. But there are many, many parts with higher priority... /Tore (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Indeed but... too late now :-( (...) ...but using plates on side of liftarms can be very helpful to stiffen chassis built with them. Philo (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Dinosaur parts
|
|
Hi all, is anybody working on these files? Animal Dinosaur Tail Section with Pin (URL) Dinosaur Tail Section End (URL) Dinosaur Head Small (URL) Bernd (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Thank you for this illustration. I see your point. These parts should have been originally modeled rotated 90 degrees around Z so that the liftarm "thickness" would have been the same a brick "width". I think I can safely say that I have (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I'll do it, but first I have to clean up this one: (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) are several of these liftarms getting changed to 18LDU? (...) Liftarms are narrower than bricks, you don't even need a caliper to see it : (URL) ...and measured with a caliper : brick width: 7.8mm liftarm width: 7.4mm liftarm height: 7.8mm As (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I agree. And the Pattern should be rebuild. In the moment it is converted with bmp2dat and so it needs some time to load the part in the preview. Also it doesn't look fine when you zoom in. CU Bernd PS: I don't own the part, so I can't rebuild (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
While we are at it, I think part 3754P01.DAT Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Picture should be renamed to Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Pattern Jaco (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I confirm Pauls measurement. I compared it with a brick and it has the same thickness. This is also needed to connect a pin with the holes. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) What are you using to measure with? I use a dial caliper. Paul (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I've measured these and several others have as well and we all got 18 LDU -Orion (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Yes that seems strange, as far as I can tell all these liftarms are the same width as a 1xN brick, so should be modelled as 20LDU as the bricks are. ROSCO (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
This part is on the Part Tracker; (URL) 32278 I have has a thickness of .0309" which is approximately 19.77LDU. Why are several of these liftarms getting changed to 18LDU? Paul (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) OK - I'll make it so. Chris (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I feel pretty strongly that the title for all patterned parts should end in the word Pattern. I would consider this enough of a reason to make the change. (...) Steve (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Pat 44567 - Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On Side
|
|
(...) Thank for the cortribution Mark but I posted this part to the Parts Tracker a few months ago: (URL) (21 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Pat 44567 - Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On Side [DAT]
|
|
Thanks to Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> for creating primative CLH6.DAT (Click Lock Hinge Single Finger for Plate Ends) available in the LDRAW_ORG Primitive UPDATE 2003-03. First time I saw this part was in bag 1 of the set 4024 - Advent (...) (21 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I did not know this, however... (...) strong (...) ... I still think it would be more consistant to do so. After all, we did put many parts in a new category, renamed ones, etc. I do not see a problem. Or is there? (...) Pattern (...) Also I (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) This due to the limitation of 66 characters on the part file title line 1 2 3 4 5 6 12345678901234567890...7890123456 3040p01 : 0 Slope Brick 45 2 x 1 with 3 Buttons, 3 Red Lamps/Yellow Panel 3039p32 : 0 Slope Brick 45 2 x 2 with 12 Buttons, 3 (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Keyword in description missing
|
|
The following parts should have "Pattern" in the Description 3040p01 3039p32 3039p33 I think this can be corrected in the next parts update? Jaco (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I still prefer: Minifig Town Castle ClassicSpace OldStyle Modern Crash With_and_without_vis...and_pivots Helmet with Skinny(Obese) Chinstrap any objections? how about the word order? ROFL w. (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Boat parts
|
|
Sets that have these parts are in many sets. Found at Peeron: 709-1 - Police Boat (1977) 314-1 - Police Boat (1976) 4005-1 - Tug Boat (1982) 315-2 - Container Ship (1976) 4015-1 - Freighter (1982) 775-1 - Fire Fighter (1977) 4025-1 - Fire Boat (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: shortcut?...or model/set?
|
|
(...) It's a model. Or at least, part of a model. It's not appropriate for the parts library, because it's a construction of common parts. Contrast that with the palm tree shortcut file, which uses some unusual parts in a mode for which they were (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Boat parts
|
|
I was more thinking of the 31x series.... (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Boat parts
|
|
(...) whoa... jaco your making the boat parts from the 40XX series? keep up the good work eh (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: shortcut?...or model/set?
|
|
(...) It depends, see Question #2 (...) A file is a shortcut if it consists of on or more indiviual parts that make up a complete part assembly. In other words, if the indiviual parts are normally found connected in a new LEGO box. There are a few (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | shortcut?...or model/set?
|
|
In the interest of generating some discussion, let me toss out there to the general CAD community. Regarding the file I created and posted [1] to the Parts Tracker: Question #1: Is it a "shortcut" file, suitable for inclusion into the parts library? (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Boat parts
|
|
Gweat work Jaco! Can't wait for the bow and stern parts ;) (21 years ago, 17-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Boat parts
|
|
Hi all, After moderation, my work on several boat parts can be seen here: (URL) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
