To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5039
5038  |  5040
Subject: 
Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:15:34 GMT
Viewed: 
7016 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> The file size concern have gotten entirly out of hand.

I have to strongly disagree with this.  If a file can be done just as well with fewer
bytes, that's a good thing.  Good for downloading, good for maintaining the part,
good for storing the parts library.

> ... Therefore the amount addded in
> new files is 550 MB and total including current files is (550 + 35.3) 585.3 MB.

I won't argue with your figures, I think 585MB is a reasonable estimate.

> If 585.3 MB is too large for your hard drive then it's time to get a new hard
> drive.  The current price on Pricewatch for a 20GB hard drive is $32 US which
> isn't very much even for a teenager mowing lawns for a living.
> 
> If bandwidth is your concern, we can get around that by sending you a copy of
> the library on CD.

That's all true, but it's more convenient -- for everyone -- to have a smaller
library that is easier to store and transmit.  There are any number of reasons that
people can't/won't upgrade.

Add to this the fact that bloated[1] part files are frequently due to underuse of
primitives, overuse of decimals places, etc.  There is definitely a case for keeping
an eye on the size of files, and looking more closely at files that are overly large.

--
Steve
1) "Bloated" meaning "bigger than it needs to be"; compare with "just as big as it
needs to be".



Message has 1 Reply:
  File Size Concerns ( Was Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW))
 
(...) I agree with the elimination of excess but I disagree with a reduction in part quality simply because it is "too large" (...) I agree again. The point I was trying to make is size concerns should not be the only reason to redo a quality[1] (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
 
(...) If it's not broke why fix it? I think the one on the PT is just fine. The file size concern have gotten entirly out of hand. Let's do some math: Peeron has 3628 out of 5589 (64%) sets invertoried for a total of 8062 parts (this includes Moved (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

9 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR