Subject:
|
Re: Naming of parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:58:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2548 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > 32059
> > 2401
> > 2450
> > 2419
> > 30503
> > 6106
>
> These ones are plates with one corner clipped, I think the 'Without Corner'
> label is better than Wing.
If LEGO were to produce a rectangular plate, say a 4x8, with a missing corner,
what would be a good way to describe it? The part could easily have a
mirror-image part, so it wouldn't be enough to say "Plate 4 x 8 without
corner," since that would really describe both of them. Hmm...
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) This one should be Wing 3 x 4 (...) These ones are plates with one corner clipped, I think the 'Without Corner' label is better than Wing. I'd like to add these ones to the list: 2621 2625 I had renamed 2625 while it was on the PT for BFC (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
