Subject:
|
Re: Naming of parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:21:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3065 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Thomas Garrison wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Bob Rodinsky wrote:
> > Another point to consider in differentiating between a wedge and a wing.
> > IMHO a wing is not symmetrical and has a matching counterpart (left & right) and
> > would be inherently thin.
> By this metric,
> http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/2413
> is not a wing. That's reasonable. If 2413 were a wing, then so would
> http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/32059
> because they are the same shape, essentially.
Perhaps the above mentioned (and other similar) parts would best be called
"wedge plates". Wedge due to the shape and plate due to the thickness.
There is such a variety of shapes and shapes there will always be exceptions to
whatever rules/guidelines we might establish
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) By this metric, (URL) not a wing. That's reasonable. If 2413 were a wing, then so would (URL) they are the same shape, essentially. (...) I agree. There are, however, times when that is not possible---for example, (URL) undoubtedly similar (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
