Subject:
|
Re: Naming of parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:00:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8947 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Orion Pobursky wrote:
>
> > > 32059
> > > 2401
> > > 2450
> > > 2419
> > > 30503
> > > 6106
> >
> > These ones are plates with one corner clipped, I think the 'Without Corner'
> > label is better than Wing.
>
> If LEGO were to produce a rectangular plate, say a 4x8, with a missing corner,
> what would be a good way to describe it? The part could easily have a
> mirror-image part, so it wouldn't be enough to say "Plate 4 x 8 without
> corner," since that would really describe both of them. Hmm...
Then you'd just use "Plate 4 x 8 Without Corner Left" and "Plate 4 x 8
Without Corner Right"
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) Doh! I posted without reviewing the current conventions. I suppose I could have inferred that the correct orientation puts the narrow (or corner-less) edge toward the front along the long axis of the part? Thanks for the quick answer, though! (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
| (...) If LEGO were to produce a rectangular plate, say a 4x8, with a missing corner, what would be a good way to describe it? The part could easily have a mirror-image part, so it wouldn't be enough to say "Plate 4 x 8 without corner," since that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
