Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:42:35 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjmasi@*nogarbageplease*rcn.com=saynotospam=
|
Viewed:
|
7394 times
|
| |
|
|
Kelly J. McKiernan wrote:
[snip]
> Now for the when.
>
> We could just be flippant and say we know it when we see it... But that's not
> very satisfactory. Rather, here are some examples:
>
> * Repeated abusive language or personal attacks, i.e. bringing more heat than
> light to a discussion... also known as attacking the person, not the position;
Is the following reason, really a good reason for discontinuing sn
individual's access? I would have thought that the best way to stop "a
should be dead thread" is by not responding to it. Why not let people
ramble if they are not offending anyone? (Pleaes cc to my e-mail since I
do not follow lugnet.admin.terms.) All of the other reasons seem like
such good reasons for suspending access that this one falls just a bit flat.
> * Deliberately prolonging a discussion without adding any new information or
> points of view, when there have been repeated calls that the discussion cease
> unless new information is brought forth;
> * Making disparaging remarks about the personal integrity of others merely to
> make a point;
> * [Continued] or [excessive] amounts of negative remarks about any person,
> company, or employees (including TLC) without bringing anything new to the
> discussion;
> * Excessive profanity (e.g. the "big seven" or anything you wouldn't want a
> child to read);
> * Deliberately and egregiously posting off topic, for example spamming theme
> groups with marketing posts after being asked not to do so;
> * Other ToS violations.
[snip]
> {On behalf of the rest of the LUGNET Administration,}¬
> [Kelly McKiernan]
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) Sorry that you don't follow lugnet.admin.terms. It's generally considered bad ettiquette to post to someplace and ask for an e-mail response because you don't read that forum... Perhaps someone else will forward this to you if you don't stop (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
