Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:57:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8589 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, Ross Crawford wrote:
> If they don't receive a note because of an inadvertant TOS violation (forgetting
> to update their email), is there an email address they can contact you
> (collectively) on? If so, that email should probably be included on the 441
> message page.
Seems to me like it might be a good idea. Probably ought to go on the list of
things to look into post code freeze and I'll so recommend.
> In fact I'd go so far as to say there SHOULD be such an address,
> and it would be remiss NOT to include it on the 441 page.
I think that might be a bit strongly worded... "remiss" sounds so pejorative.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) If they don't receive a note because of an inadvertant TOS violation (forgetting to update their email), is there an email address they can contact you (collectively) on? If so, that email should probably be included on the 441 message page. (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|