Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:00:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8106 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
Just out of curiosity, is there any sort of appeal process?
|
We have not developed one.
|
I think part of the reason why is that an appeal process would probably take
longer than a suspension in the first place. Most suspensions would be in the
range of 24 hrs to 72 hrs (1 day - 3 days) - and an appeal process (which would
require contacting more admins and getting their opinions, and Admins are rarely
all online at the same time, and then the Admins to discuss and come to a
conclusion) would probably take a week (5-7 days) or more.
I’d think an appeal process would be more important for dealing with permanent
bans, etc - punishments of a longer duration than the ones we’re discussing
here.
-Lenny
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) Yeah, now that I think about it, I guess that makes sense. But does a Timeout go on one's "permanent record?" If not, then a 72-hour appeal process wouldn't be of much use against a 24-hour Timeout. But if a Timeout does remain as a blot on my (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) We have not developed one. Hopefully there won't really be a need but if there is, (that is, if someone gets timed out and then sends a note to the admins contesting the decision) we would either look at it again, ad-hoc, or develop one. We (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
