Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Sat, 1 Jan 2005 07:21:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8128 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
| |
Does this post and the new process and authorising of said reminder, not
imply that their will be more of presence of it being used?
|
“more of presence” ?? Did you mean higher probability or something similar?
If so... Not necessarily.
|
This actually makes no sense to me then (and yes, please bare with me, since
I have 40 ounces of Bailey in me, being the New Year et al, plus the added
affect of various “smokebles”..... )..... I have only one question
then........ Why bother making a new post, getting a committee together, and
all the freaking (can I say that?) hoopla, if its not going to have at least
some minor, if not major impact on the posting procedure as we know it?
Regardless, if I am for or against it, and in this state I’m not entirely
sure, but surely there must be a point I am missing. Clarity is paramount,
and I personally would like to know, why make this step if there is no
concrete plan to actually make more “of a presence” or a higher probability
if you so want to choose the wording, in “cracking down” with the ToS, or
ToU, or whatever abbreviation is appropriate?
|
Sorry if my answer was a bit cryptic there!
What I am trying to say is that if the new policy means that people act more
in accordance with the ToS than they have in the recent past, it may well be
that no time outs are actually given out (that is, the power won’t need to be
used), or at least not more than the average frequency in the past.
|
[snip]
So I guess that means you’re hoping the “increased presence” is just making the
policy more obvious to newbies and forgetfuls?
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) Happy New Year, Janey... Sorry if my answer was a bit cryptic there! What I am trying to say is that if the new policy means that people act more in accordance with the ToS than they have in the recent past, it may well be that no time outs (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
