To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 486
485  |  487
Subject: 
Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:41:52 GMT
Viewed: 
8205 times
  
This could be the beginning of the end for me...

“Making disparaging remarks about the personal integrity of others merely to make a point”

So I can’t call Soren Roberts the smelly village idiot, with all the integrity of a back-room pornographer?

“put-downs, condescension, sly remarks, insults, sarcasm, and other un-helpful, selfish behavior”

Sly remarks?..that will not pose a problem because most of my humor is not of a ‘sly nature’. But what about the rapier-like whit of Nick Kappatos or Richard Marchetti? No insults? So I can’t talk about Derek’s mom anymore? But what of the smack, gentlemen, what of the smack?

-Keith

(I’m reserving my space in the time-out corner now ;)



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
 
In lugnet.admin.terms, Keith Goldman wrote: <snip> (...) What????? These new rules mean that we can't lay down the smack??? K, I'm a changin' my vote! ;) Dave K (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
  Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
 
(...) Um, as I understand it the truth is always a defense against charges of libel. So you should be OK. Or are you saying he's not actually those things? I get so confused. (1) More seriously, and this is a real problem that I don't know the real (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
  Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
 
(...) I'd say it's a matter of intent. "Smack" and banter = OK, so long as it's clear to smacker and smackee that it's all in fun, not a serious slam. And as long as it's not scatalogical or profane (remember, that's what email's for!) I wouldn't (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
  Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
 
(...) 1) You have some nerve to speak your piece on back-room pornograpers. I know back-room pornographers, sir; you are no back-room pornographer. Too long has the plight of the BRP gone ignored. BRP's work in our schools, our churches, our (...) (20 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)  

Message is in Reply To:
  LUGNET Posting Policy Update
 
LUGNET administration has always had the ability to temporarily or permanently suspend the posting privileges of a user or member. In the past this has been only very rarely used. The mechanism for doing so was such that only Todd (or for a time, (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, FTX) !! 

48 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR