Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Sat, 1 Jan 2005 07:03:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8134 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
| |
Does this post and the new process and authorising of said reminder, not
imply that their will be more of presence of it being used?
|
“more of presence” ?? Did you mean higher probability or something similar?
If so... Not necessarily.
|
This actually makes no sense to me then (and yes, please bare with me, since I
have 40 ounces of Bailey in me, being the New Year et al, plus the added affect
of various “smokebles”..... )..... I have only one question then........ Why
bother making a new post, getting a committee together, and all the freaking
(can I say that?) hoopla, if its not going to have at least some minor, if not
major impact on the posting procedure as we know it? Regardless, if I am for or
against it, and in this state I’m not entirely sure, but surely there must be a
point I am missing. Clarity is paramount, and I personally would like to know,
why make this step if there is no concrete plan to actually make more “of a
presence” or a higher probability if you so want to choose the wording, in
“cracking down” with the ToS, or ToU, or whatever abbreviation is appropriate?
Hmmmmm does that actually count as two (maybe technically three) questions?
(Like it matters)
Janey “Drunk enough to know she shouldn’t post, sober enough to know she means
it” Red Brick
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) Happy New Year, Janey... Sorry if my answer was a bit cryptic there! What I am trying to say is that if the new policy means that people act more in accordance with the ToS than they have in the recent past, it may well be that no time outs (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
