| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > "We are not going to debate" might not be the best phrasing but that's the
> > important idea to convey. How would you phrase it differently?
>
> How about "Any further debate will not change the original decision, but may, if
> a convincing argument is put, cause the Administration to consider actions which
> may (fully or partially) undo a previous decision"?
>
> That does not specify whether or not Admins will take part in any debate, but
> does make it plain that arguments arising from admin decisions will always be
> considered. The current wording does not give any such assurance.
Wow. You're right Ross, that is worded much better. That reminds me, I
probably shouldn't be posting this right now without my lawyer being present.
There might be some minor misunderstanding that prompts endless accusations at
my character and my ability to be understanding and appreciative of criticism.
-Lenny
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
