| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
I think it does. If there was total trust, we wouldn’t require a policy
document.
|
And THAT’S the crux of why LUGNET is at least partly broken. The admins don’t
trust (some of) the users and (some of) the users (not necessarily the same
ones) don’t trust the admins.
|
OK let me put it another way, if it’s worth creating a P&P doc, it’s worth
assuring the users they will be listened to.
|
Yeah, I don’t believe this. The LPRV is a great example. The Admins gathered a
group of people and said, we trust you guys! We want to know what you think!
And then, seemingly out of nowhere, they started accusing the Admins of creating
a rubber stamp committee.
If you don’t trust me, then no matter HOW many times I say “I want to listen” -
you will always think I’m lying to you.. or being sarcastic or whatever. I’ve
seen it happen quite a few times.
This is an excellent example -
Scott accuses me of being insincere when I was trying to reassure. What then?
-Lenny
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Trust: was Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) You told us you wanted us to wordsmith it and fix syntax and gramatical errors. When I first started proposing ideas that were not in the document, a member of LTT started arguing with me. In an attempt to look at each case, I applied *my* (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
