Subject:
|
Re: Official and Unofficial theme categories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 13:41:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.iwantnospam.=AntiSpam=com
|
Viewed:
|
3182 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> p.s. Larry: When we met in In August, you suggested that two-way fuzzy
> references probably ought to accommodate separate fuzzy-values in each
> direction, just in case it was ever needed. At the time, we couldn't come
> up with any real-life examples. But maybe here's one: If you're assocating
> the set "female" with the set "woman" (this example DB has these for female
> minifigs and the Belville mom), isn't it true that all women are female but
> not all females are women? That is, "woman" is a 100%-subset of "female"
> while "female" is perhaps only a 75%-subset of "woman" in the LEGO world.
> I need to re-read Kosko on the subject of super-sets being fractional
> subsets of the smaller sets they themselves contain, but I think this might
> actually be a real example of what we were wondering about...
Right. some dogs are female, and some aren't, but no dogs are women (and
no women are dogs, either, right? :-) )
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Official and Unofficial theme categories
|
| (...) Here's an example of what I mean by wanting things to "just work" -- and wanting the categories to be relatively transparent by default. If you type in "bike" into this element-search thingie, (URL) fails to find any pieces labeled as "bike." (...) (28 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
