Subject:
|
Re: Official and Unofficial theme categories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 07:33:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1162 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> Temporal: (this is the weakest part, it requires a lot more thought)
> Always Available
> 1961
> ...
> 1996
> June
> 1997
I have a couple of thoughts on the time classification
1) apply a full range of tags - first appearance, last appearance (in a
catalogue, end of promo, etc), last available (retail), last available (S@H),
last seen (auction/sale). This I think has the most flexibility, but has the
drawback of being an input-hog - the sheer amount of data required (much of it
hard to find) is insane.
2) (this is fuzzy, as I'm thinking as I type) Have only a first appearance/last
appearance (indicating the actual 'release period' as indicated by appearances
in catalogues) attached to each set, and following that an "availability?"
characteristic ranging from 'very common' - which is often the state shortly
after a set isn't produced to 'extremely rare' which is often the case 5 or
more years down the road.
I think that with the number of enthusiasts we've got access to, it should be
relatively easy to create a sliding scale to govern the 'availability' based on
past experience - and it should get more accurate over time. Some sets will
obviously be anomalies (Guarded Inn comes to mind), but it should be workable.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Official and Unofficial theme categories
|
| (...) It all started harmlessly enough ;-) I said, "there are red ninjas and blue ninjas, the old ones are blue, the new ones are red..." and Nik said, "no there aren't Dad, there are no blue ninjas", and I said "what?" and he told me about the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
