To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 51620
51619  |  51621
Subject: 
Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:53:53 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
2060 times
  
In lugnet.announce.moc, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
   Well okay... I guess it’s not a real MOC, (I wasnt sure what news group to use.)
-snip- Spotlighted. But I can’t really thank you for sharing this one, Janey. I think this sort of thing (especially that you publicised it soo much(1)) is bad press for the AFOL community at large.

Tattoos are an adult activity, and carry some significant health risks and various social stigmas as well.

By posting (or was that ‘boasting’) about your tattoos here – on a family friendly forum - you have, perhaps unwittingly, encouraged young people to get tattooed. In many areas, tattooing is illegal on non-adults. Tattoo parlours are dens of iniquity, where wide eyed youth, intent on getting a tattoo of a simple brick or their favourite Bionicle could come face to face (or face to other parts of the body) with drug dealers, motorcycle gang members, and even drunken sailors.

You are a cool builder, Janey. Your micro work rocks. You have a strong fan following, which may well follow your example and be tattooed. But will they go to a parlour which uses sterile needles and follows good health practices? Or will they go to some undesirable part of town, unaccompanied, and bare their shoulder (or worse) to some tattooed ‘artist’? If they do, do you take responsibility for encouraging them to this ‘choice’?

You posted your tat post healing. Why not show the young and impressionable what it’s like whilst it is healing? It’s not all fun and bright colours. Why not tell them the risks? Search the net for some pics of tats gone wrong, and post them too.

As your post clearly showed, tattoos are addictive. Imagine if some kid starts with a simple Bionicle tat, but his interests move on to technic, so he adds a 1x8 technic brick and a gear or two, and then he gets into mindstorms, so adds an RCX, and then moves on to trains (adds a Santa Fe Super Chief) and then to historic 1960’s sets and so on. A body disfigured for what? Will you comfort him when girls reject him? Will you give him a job when employers reject him?

And you justify your post by saying “At least it’s Lego related”?

Cheers

Richie Dulin

(1) = What happens on JLUG can stay on JLUG - but Lugnet, et al. is a different story.



Message has 8 Replies:
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
(...) These are valid concerns. Thanks for this very thoughtful commentary. I'm still getting one though - maybe the Blacktron 2 logo. How bad could drunken sailors really be? Allister (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
WTH! Richie, get the heck out of here. YOUR bad press for the community at large with your constant (*(^&$$*&^%^(*)_*, )(& )*)(&^&*^&$ and I'll show you some bad press for the community at large with some _)*)(&^(&%$&%# of my own! Go beeeyotch about (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)  
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
In > Spotlighted. But I can’t really thank you for sharing this one, Janey. I (...) Richie, i think this is a matter of opinion and this lugnet being one of the freindliest places on the internet; your negativity, i find; is unwelcome. If people (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)  
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
(...) Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win. Everyone else: Don't feed the troll. (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX) ! 
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
In lugnet.general, Richie Dulin wrote (...) snip All this about bad press from the guy who made a flying swastika. LOL. Jake (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
Hypocrite. Don't spotlight it (and brag about it) if you think it's bad press. (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
In lugnet.general, Richie Dulin wrote: (snipped a bunch of crap... cause I was laughing so hard I couldn't control the mouse) Thanks Richie, as always you put a perfectly twisted perspective on the entire event. My tat will never be the same. Janey (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
(...) My tatoo artist has a master's degree in art and a hospital-grade autoclave. No iniquity, no danger. And she won't tatoo anybody who's drunk, either. (...) Chicks dig tatoos, man. (...) Always get tattooed in a place you can cover! (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
 
Well okay... I guess it's not a real MOC, (I wasnt sure what news group to use.) AND maybe it's NOT really even ~MY~ latest MOC... but actually the chick at the tattoo shop "second" MOC... (Since she already did both my red one, and now the new (...) (19 years ago, 5-Sep-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.general, FTX) !! 

53 Messages in This Thread:




























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR