Subject:
|
Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:27:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
462 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, James Brink writes:
> Is there any way to make the rating public? The votes must be linked to the
> voter somehow in the database. Could links be set up on the 100-0 scale to
> let people see who voted 100, 90, ..., 0 for the set. Maybe people would
> vote how they actually felt instead of trying to skew the results if they
> were somehow held accountable for their vote. Just an idea...
A very good idea. I'm not sure how much screen real estate would be
required, but this would certainly keep people honest.
Regards,
Allan B.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| (...) If it was done so that those interested could click on a rating, and that would bring up a list of everyone that gave that rating, it need take up no extra space at all... I tend to check the database for stuff that I'm interested in buying (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| Is there any way to make the rating public? The votes must be linked to the voter somehow in the database. Could links be set up on the 100-0 scale to let people see who voted 100, 90, ..., 0 for the set. Maybe people would vote how they actually (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
